Skip to main content

Security report for jagodevelopments.com

NET GRP Ltd · Telecommunications · United Kingdom

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in DNS health, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NET GRP Ltd is a UK-based company specializing in manufacturing and servicing telecommunications infrastructure components using Glass Reinforced Plastics (GRP). The company offers bespoke and production run fibreglass architectural cladding, painted cladding, and maintenance services, targeting telecommunications clients requiring high-quality infrastructure integration. The website is professionally designed using WordPress CMS, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Contact information is clearly provided, including company emails and phone numbers, and a LinkedIn presence supports business credibility. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and formal security policies. The WHOIS data for the domain queried is unavailable due to an invalid domain name format, but the website content and company registration details support legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy business with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jagodevelopments.com

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
35
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NET GRP operates in a niche telecommunications sector focusing on GRP products for infrastructure. Their business model centers on manufacturing and maintenance services, supported by NET Group. The company targets telecommunications infrastructure providers and clients needing architectural and concealment cladding solutions. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a stable market position. The presence of a partner domain (netcs.co.uk) suggests a partnership ecosystem. The company registration number is prominently displayed, enhancing trust. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a low digital marketing footprint. The business appears small-sized with specialized offerings and a focus on quality and client needs.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, formal policies, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance to enhance legal adherence and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish security and incident response policies, including a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website analytics and marketing transparency while respecting user privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
NET GRP Ltd
Registration number
14926767
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NET GRP Ltd
Description
NET GRP produces bespoke and production run items primarily in Glass Fibre industry, offering fibreglass architectural cladding, GRP cladding/concealment, painted cladding, and maintenance/inspection services. They emphasize versatility, problem solving, and high standards.
Key services
Fibreglass architectural cladding, GRP cladding/concealment, Painted cladding for infrastructure integration, Maintenance and inspection services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, MetaSlider plugin
Frameworks
WordPress block editor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails and phone numbers
  4. No forms detected on homepage; minimal data collection observed
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and jQuery
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. Company registration number is displayed in footer
  9. LinkedIn social media link present
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 7.0 with the Twenty Twenty-Four theme and uses jQuery and the MetaSlider plugin for image sliders. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. No advanced analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy tools.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jagodevelopments.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jagodevelopments.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.