Skip to main content

Security report for jagasantagostino.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jagasantagostino.com serves as a personal digital garden for Jaga Santagostino, featuring minimal content and primarily acting as a landing page directing visitors to a newer version at 2024.jagasantagostino.com. The site is built using the Astro framework and utilizes Google Fonts, hosted on infrastructure associated with Zeit (now Vercel). The technical setup is modern but basic, with no detected CMS or advanced platform integrations. The website is mobile optimized with basic accessibility and SEO features but lacks comprehensive content and navigation clarity. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and any contact or incident response information. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection and user tracking. The domain registration is consistent and appropriate for a personal or small business website, with no suspicious patterns detected. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile but is limited in content, security posture, and compliance features. It is suitable as a personal digital garden but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and richer content to improve trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jagasantagostino.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a personal or small-scale digital presence rather than a commercial business. It targets a general audience interested in the author's digital garden content. The business model appears to be personal content sharing without monetization or commercial services. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The domain age and hosting setup suggest a stable but modest online presence. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the current content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enabled, and domain status protections are in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the site has a low attack surface due to minimal content and no forms but would benefit from improved security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  4. Provide contact information and establish an incident response contact channel for security issues.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Jaga Santagostino's Digital Garden 🌱
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Astro, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and appears to be a placeholder or landing page for a personal digital garden.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present.
  3. No contact information or forms are available on the page.
  4. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website uses Astro framework and Google Fonts.
  7. Domain is registered and maintained with standard protections but lacks DNSSEC.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. No social media or email contact information found.
  10. Website is accessible without WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Astro static site framework and Google Fonts, indicating a modern and lightweight technical stack. Hosting is inferred to be on Zeit/Vercel infrastructure based on the nameservers. The site loads moderate performance with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. There is no CMS detected, and the site appears to be a static or lightly dynamic personal site. SEO is basic with meta title and description but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. No analytics or third-party scripts are present, reducing potential technical risks but also limiting insights into user behavior.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jagasantagostino.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jagasantagostino.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.