Skip to main content

Security report for jaclean.de

J.A. Clean · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

J.A. Clean is a well-established company specializing in industrial floor marking, repair, and cleaning services with a strong presence in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, and Slovakia. The company positions itself as a market leader in safety markings in the Czech market and offers a comprehensive range of services tailored to industrial clients. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and customer testimonials, supporting their credibility and market position. The technical infrastructure is based on Joomla CMS with modern UIkit framework and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for marketing and tracking purposes. Mobile optimization and SEO are adequately addressed, providing a good user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is well-handled with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and GDPR-aligned policies, although a dedicated privacy policy page is not explicitly found. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaclean.de

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on industrial floor services including marking, reconstruction, and cleaning. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting industrial clients in the DACH and Central European regions. With 18 years of experience and over 31,000 projects completed, they demonstrate strong operational capacity and market penetration. The presence of multiple regional partner domains and an online inquiry platform indicates a diversified digital ecosystem supporting customer engagement. The company leverages social media channels for brand visibility and customer interaction. No direct revenue streams or financial data are disclosed, but the extensive project count and customer base suggest a medium-sized enterprise with stable growth. Strategic partnerships and regional focus enhance their competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. CSRF tokens are implemented, indicating awareness of common web security threats. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in vulnerability management. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR-compliant, reflecting good privacy practices. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing incident response contacts to enhance security posture and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated privacy policy page clearly accessible from the main navigation.
  2. Implement and expose a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide public incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
J.A.CLEAN spol. s r. o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
J.A. Clean
Description
J.A. Clean is a company specializing in industrial floor marking, repair, and deep cleaning services primarily in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, and Slovakia. They emphasize safety and quality in industrial floor services with 18 years of experience and over 31,000 projects completed.
Key services
Safety and traffic marking of industrial floors, Floor laying and reconstruction, Deep cleaning and repair of industrial floors, Diverse marking and industrial floor solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, UIkit framework, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Webcomponents.js
Frameworks
UIkit, Joomla
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in scripts
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Uses Joomla CMS with modern UIkit framework
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent with detailed cookie categories
  4. Contact info is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube
  6. No explicit privacy policy page found but cookie policy and contact page provide privacy info
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanism found
  9. Uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with integration of UIkit for UI components and jQuery for scripting. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for marketing and analytics tracking. The site is hosted likely by Forpsi, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the company's regional focus. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds and multiple scripts, but mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Some hidden spam links (e.g., mosbetuz.com, plinko.org) were detected in the content, which should be reviewed and removed to maintain site integrity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from performance optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaclean.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaclean.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.