Skip to main content

Security report for jackandanna.co.uk

Jack & Anna · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jack & Anna is a UK-based consultancy focused on helping leadership teams accelerate growth and revenue through strategic planning and capability building. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring clear messaging about growth strategy, go to market, ROI delivery, and capability building services. The technical infrastructure is modern and secure, with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, hosted on Squarespace's CDN platform. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of explicit contact information, and failure to retrieve WHOIS data for the domain reduce overall trust and compliance posture. Security headers are minimal but adequate, and no vulnerabilities or tracking scripts were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site presents a professional business image but requires improvements in privacy compliance and transparency to enhance credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jackandanna.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
64
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets leadership teams seeking to improve growth outcomes through consulting services. Their market position is niche, focusing on growth acceleration strategies and execution support. The business model is service-based consulting with no e-commerce or direct sales evident. The website content is consistent and relevant, but lacks detailed business registration or certification information. The LinkedIn profile link suggests a professional presence, but no additional partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The absence of contact emails and phone numbers limits direct engagement opportunities. The company appears small and focused on UK clients, with no indication of larger corporate affiliations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. Security headers beyond HSTS are not evident, and no advanced security policies like Content-Security-Policy were found. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The lack of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited security transparency. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is secure from a transport perspective but could improve in governance and compliance areas.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  4. Create a security policy page and provide incident response contact channels to demonstrate security governance.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS registration issues to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jack & Anna
Description
Consultancy working with leadership teams to accelerate growth and revenue by providing growth strategy, go to market, ROI delivery, and capability building services.
Key services
Growth strategy, Go to market strategy, ROI delivery, Capability building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional consultancy site built on Squarespace.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn profile link.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain registration error.
  7. HTTPS and HSTS are properly configured.
  8. No tracking or analytics scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging its CDN and platform capabilities. The HTML and CSS are valid and modern, with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Performance is moderate, typical of Squarespace-hosted sites. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data beyond a simple WebSite schema. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jackandanna.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jackandanna.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.