Skip to main content

Security report for jablotron.cz

Jablotron Alarmsysteme s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jablotron Alarmsysteme s.r.o. is a medium-sized technology company specializing in the development and manufacture of security systems and smart home solutions. The company targets both residential and commercial customers, offering alarm systems, smart home automation, and security monitoring services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating compliance with GDPR regulations. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and security headers in place. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and security best practices, though the lack of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is safe, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jablotron.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jablotron.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
346
Employees
3
Customers
322
Third parties
21
Weak passwords
26%

Latest record dated 2025-11-04 · 19 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jablotron.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –apps.jablotron.cz2025-11-04
  • –intranet.jablotron.cz2025-04-16
  • –extapps.jablotron.cz2025-04-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate jablotron.cz and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
2
Registered
2
Resolving
2
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • ja•••••••.czMediumhomoglyph
  • ja••••.ron.czLowsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of jablotron.cz with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jablotron holds a strong position in the European security technology market, leveraging a B2B and B2C business model. Their product portfolio focuses on integrated security and smart home solutions, appealing to homeowners and security professionals alike. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement, supporting customer interaction and brand trust. While the domain registration details are not publicly available, the company's established market presence and consistent branding mitigate some concerns. The website's moderate performance and good SEO practices support customer acquisition and retention. Strategic partnerships and certifications were not explicitly found, suggesting potential areas for business development and trust enhancement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Google reCAPTCHA indicates protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No critical vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. To elevate security maturity, Jablotron should consider publishing detailed security and incident response policies and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program. These steps would enhance customer trust and demonstrate proactive security management.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and broaden user inclusivity.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Maintain updated WHOIS information or use verified domain registration to improve trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jablotron Alarmsysteme s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jablotron Alarmsysteme s.r.o.
Description
Jablotron develops and manufactures security systems, smart home solutions, and related technology products primarily for residential and commercial customers.
Key services
Alarm systems, Smart home automation, Security monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and has good security headers.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, styled with Tailwind CSS, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, contributing to a secure browsing experience. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, with cookie consent mechanisms in place. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details were not identified. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and to publish more comprehensive security documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jablotron.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jablotron.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.