Skip to main content

Security report for jabil.com

Jabil Inc. · Manufacturing · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jabil Inc. is a global leader in manufacturing solutions, providing comprehensive engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain services to top brands across multiple industries including automotive, healthcare, energy, and technology. The company operates a vast network of over 100 sites worldwide, combining global reach with local expertise to deliver scalable and customized solutions. Their business model focuses on B2B partnerships with original equipment manufacturers and product companies, emphasizing sustainability and community impact. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Vidyard, Lottie animations, and marketing automation tools like Pardot. The site is hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN and uses Magnolia CMS. The website design is professional, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, with good accessibility features. However, performance metrics are unavailable. From a security perspective, the site implements several security headers and a comprehensive Content Security Policy. Despite this, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no modern TLS protocols are enabled, representing critical vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in security transparency. Overall, the website is content-rich and professionally maintained but requires urgent remediation of SSL and TLS configurations to ensure secure communications and maintain trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. The domain registration details align with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jabil.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jabil holds a strong market position as a large enterprise manufacturing solutions provider with a diversified portfolio of services including advanced assembly, automation, autonomous systems, and supply chain management. Their target customers are primarily OEMs and product companies in sectors such as automotive, healthcare, energy, and technology. The company leverages partnerships and subdomains for procurement, investor relations, and careers, indicating a mature ecosystem. The website content and structure reflect a focus on sustainability, innovation, and customer-centric solutions, supporting growth and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but with critical weaknesses. While security headers and CSP are implemented, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support severely undermine secure communications. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further impacts security and performance. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, which may affect transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools suggests a high level of user tracking, which is balanced by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Immediate SSL/TLS remediation is recommended to elevate security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure SSL certificates to enable HTTPS with valid trust chains.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to reduce use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'.
  6. Maintain and regularly audit privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure compliance.
  7. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  8. Optimize accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magnolia CMS and hosted via Amazon CloudFront CDN, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and Lottie for animations. Marketing and analytics tools include Google Tag Manager, Pardot, Visual Website Optimizer, and multiple tracking pixels. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. However, performance data is missing, and SSL/TLS configurations are critically flawed. The DNS setup is robust with multiple A records, MX records pointing to Outlook protection, and a valid SPF record including multiple trusted services. No DNSSEC or CAA records are present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jabil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jabil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.