Skip to main content

Security report for izic.cz

Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.izic.cz currently serves as a placeholder page indicating that a new website is under preparation. It provides minimal business information limited to a contact phone number and email address. The lack of substantive content, privacy policies, or terms of service suggests the site is not yet operational or publicly launched. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain may be unregistered, recently registered, or privacy-protected with no public data. This raises concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain at this time. Technically, the site is minimalistic, loading only Google Fonts and basic HTML/CSS. There is no evidence of a CMS, analytics, or security headers. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges but lacks HTTPS information, which is critical for secure communications. Mobile optimization and SEO are basic at best due to the placeholder nature. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies represents significant vulnerabilities and compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not collect user data via forms or tracking scripts, reducing immediate risk but also limiting business functionality. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include securing the domain registration, implementing HTTPS, developing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing website content and structure, and establishing security best practices before public launch.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching izic.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the placeholder status of the website and lack of WHOIS data, there is insufficient information to analyze market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams. The site targets a general audience in the Czech Republic and appears to be a small-scale business or project in early development. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information is available. The business model and key services are not disclosed. The lack of branding consistency and trust indicators further limit business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The current security posture is minimal and immature. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. While no active vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of basic security controls poses a high risk for future exploitation once the site becomes operational. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enhance website content with clear business information, services, and navigation to improve professionalism and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Placeholder page indicating a new website is being prepared. Contact info provided.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a placeholder page indicating a new site is under preparation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered or recently registered domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information limited to one phone number and one email address.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status information available.
  6. Minimal technical implementation with only Google Fonts loaded.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No social media or external business links present except Google Fonts.
  9. Content quality and professionalism are poor due to placeholder nature.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and CSS, loading only Google Fonts from an external domain. There is no evidence of a CMS, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, or tracking technologies. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level due to viewport meta tag and font usage but lacks advanced accessibility or SEO optimizations. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content but cannot be fully assessed without server response data. The technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization and security improvements are needed before launch.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with izic.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review izic.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.