The website www.iwgwomenandsport.org appears to be built on the Wix platform but currently presents minimal or blocked content, likely due to security or access restrictions. The WHOIS data is malformed and incomplete, lacking registrar, creation, expiry, and registrant details, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or business details are available on the site. Technically, the site uses standard Wix technologies and polyfills but lacks visible security headers or SSL configuration information. Overall, the site is not currently suitable for trust or business engagement due to its limited content and lack of transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention iwgwomenandsport.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for iwgwomenandsport.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Due to the absence of meaningful content and business information, it is not possible to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target audience of the entity behind the domain. The lack of contact details and company identifiers further limits business intelligence insights. The site appears to be either under development, restricted, or improperly configured, which negatively impacts its credibility and potential market presence.
Security posture
The security posture of the website is weak or unknown. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and the WHOIS data is incomplete, which may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site may be behind a generic WAF or security mechanism that blocks WHOIS queries and restricts content access, but this also limits the ability to assess security maturity. Immediate improvements are needed to establish trust and compliance.
Recommendations
Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
Provide clear contact information including company address, phone, and email for transparency.
Ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate to improve domain trustworthiness.
Add security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Generic detected. WHOIS query returned 'Malformed request.' and website content is minimal with no meaningful data, indicating possible blocking or WAF challenge. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.
Website is built on Wix platform but content is minimal or blocked.
WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, indicating possible privacy protection or query blocking.
No contact, privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
No security headers or SSL information available.
No business or company information is present on the site.
External resources are mostly Wix-related domains.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Website appears non-functional or under construction.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is hosted on Wix and uses standard Wix JavaScript libraries and polyfills. The site lacks visible SEO optimization, accessibility features, and performance enhancements. The minimal content and absence of metadata or structured data indicate a low level of digital maturity. The site may be experiencing access restrictions or is under construction, which affects its usability and discoverability. Technical improvements should focus on content enrichment, SEO, accessibility, and security hardening.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with iwgwomenandsport.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iwgwomenandsport.org.