Skip to main content

Security report for iwantporn.net

Iwantporn.net · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iwantporn.net operates as a specialized adult content directory focusing on providing a curated list of the best and most popular porn sites across multiple categories. Founded in 2014, the site emphasizes quality over quantity, offering users a safe browsing experience by performing malware and phishing checks twice daily. The business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing, linking to numerous external adult sites, many of which are premium or freemium. The website targets adult users seeking a comprehensive and organized portal to adult content. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Owl Carousel, with Cloudflare DNS services. While the site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and does not provide contact information or security policies, which impacts its privacy compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with domain protections in place but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iwantporn.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site holds a niche position as a trusted adult content directory with a focus on quality and safety. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive categorization, regular malware checks, and refusal to sell rankings, which enhances credibility. Revenue is likely generated through affiliate commissions from linked premium sites. The target audience is adult consumers of online pornographic content. The partnership ecosystem includes affiliate networks and related adult directories. Growth indicators include multilingual support and a large curated listing. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in improving privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers and updates, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security gap. No explicit security headers or HTTPS enforcement details were found in the provided data. The site claims to perform malware and phishing checks twice daily, which is a positive practice. However, the absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information for incident response reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, indicating limited formal security communication. Overall, the site should improve its security posture by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing clear privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with strong TLS configurations.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  4. Publish terms of service and security policies including incident response contacts.
  5. Introduce security headers such as HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Provide clear contact information for business and security inquiries to improve trust.
  7. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  8. Regularly audit third-party scripts and affiliate links for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iwantporn.net
Description
A porn directory listing free porn sites and popular premium sites with more than 500 in 30+ categories including Tubes, Amateurs, Teens, BDSM and Hentai.
Key services
Porn site directory, Quality and popularity ranking, Malware and phishing checks, Multilingual content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain has clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited status
  • DNSSEC not enabled
  • Malware and phishing checks claimed twice daily

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive adult content directory with extensive categorized listings.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC enabled.
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. Affiliate marketing is a key business model with many external affiliate links.
  8. No forms collecting user data detected on the main page.
  9. Content is adult-oriented and intended for adults only with RTA meta tag.
  10. Multilingual support with alternate hreflang links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking user interactions, including outbound link clicks. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and multilingual support via hreflang tags. However, no modern frameworks or CMS were detected, indicating a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and asynchronous scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA or semantic improvements possible. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of HTTPS enforcement details. Modernization opportunities include adopting security best practices and enhancing privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iwantporn.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iwantporn.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.