Skip to main content

Security report for ivans.com

Ivans · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ivans is an enterprise-level technology company specializing in digital insurance software that connects carriers, MGAs, and agencies. Positioned as a leading industry network, Ivans offers a suite of solutions designed to streamline workflows across the insurance lifecycle, enhancing connectivity and business growth. The company operates under the parent organization Applied Systems, Inc., and targets insurance professionals including agents and brokers. Their offerings include digital distribution platforms, claims communications, and industry insights, supported by a strong brand presence and multiple awards. Technically, the Ivans website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Google Tag Manager, and Drift Chat. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and supports TLS 1.3 and 1.2, ensuring secure HTTPS connections. However, performance is suboptimal with a slow page load time and large page size, and some security best practices like HSTS and certificate transparency are not fully implemented. From a security perspective, Ivans demonstrates a solid baseline with no critical vulnerabilities detected, valid SPF records, and OCSP stapling enabled. The absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact is a notable gap. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR considerations. The site integrates extensive tracking and marketing tools, indicating a high level of user data collection and tracking. Overall, Ivans presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-branded digital presence with strong business credibility. The main areas for improvement include enhancing website performance, strengthening SSL/TLS security configurations, and publishing explicit security policies and incident response information to bolster trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ivans.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ivans.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ivans.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ivans operates in the insurance technology sector as a B2B software provider, focusing on digital connectivity solutions for insurance carriers, MGAs, and agencies. Their market position is that of an industry network leader, leveraging partnerships with sister brands like Indio, EZLynx, and Tarmika under the Applied Systems umbrella. The company’s business model revolves around providing SaaS platforms and digital tools that facilitate insurance product distribution, claims processing, and agency collaboration. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, subscription services, and professional services. Ivans targets insurance professionals, emphasizing streamlined workflows and digital transformation. The presence of multiple awards and customer testimonials indicates strong market acceptance and competitive advantage. Their partnership ecosystem and integration with marketing and analytics platforms reflect a mature digital marketing strategy and customer engagement approach.

Security posture

Ivans exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced via TLS 1.3 and 1.2, OCSP stapling enabled, and no critical SSL vulnerabilities detected. The SPF record is comprehensive and valid, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the lack of HSTS and certificate transparency compliance are areas for improvement. No security policy or incident response information is publicly disclosed, which could hinder transparency and trust. The site uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts, which may increase the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, Ivans maintains a solid baseline security level appropriate for an enterprise SaaS provider but should enhance security headers and publish formal security policies to improve posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Improve SSL certificate transparency compliance by ensuring certificates are logged in public CT logs.
  4. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and resource count to improve load times and user experience.
  5. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ivans
Technical notes

Notes

The Ivans website is built on a modern front-end stack utilizing jQuery and Bootstrap 4.6, with extensive integration of marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Drift Chat, and Bizible. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS and NS servers, providing reliable DNS resolution and potential CDN benefits. SSL/TLS configuration supports modern protocols TLS 1.3 and 1.2 with OCSP stapling enabled, though lacks HSTS and certificate transparency compliance. The site suffers from slow performance with a large page size (~2.1 MB) and high resource count (394), resulting in a load time of approximately 18.5 seconds, indicating opportunities for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is well supported with comprehensive metadata and structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ivans.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ivans.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.