Skip to main content

Security report for ivancice.cz

Město Ivančice · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ivancice.cz serves as the official municipal portal for the city of Ivančice in the Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information about the city administration, local government bodies, public services, events, and community resources. The site targets residents, local businesses, and visitors seeking official information and services. The business model is that of a government entity providing public information and services. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm a long-standing presence consistent with a municipal authority. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, including SEO and GDPR compliance tools. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, with good SEO metadata and structured data enhancing discoverability. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosures are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ivancice.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ivančice.cz positions itself as the authoritative source for municipal information in Ivančice, serving a small local government sector. Its competitive advantage lies in comprehensive local content, official documentation, and integration with government services such as public tenders and official notices. The site supports transparency and citizen engagement through accessible contact information and event calendars. Revenue streams are typical for government entities, funded by public budgets. The partnership ecosystem includes links to regional government portals and local service providers. Growth indicators include regular content updates and integration of digital services. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency by publishing privacy and security policies explicitly.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and GDPR cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and may expose the site to compliance risks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of published contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in policy publication and incident management.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user obligations and site usage policies.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy outlining security controls and incident response procedures.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Město Ivančice
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Ivančice
Description
Město Ivančice tvoří sedm místních částí; Alexovice, Budkovice, Hrubšice, Ivančice, Letkovice, Němčice, Řeznovice. Obec s rozšířenou působností s více jak 9600 obyvateli. První písemná zpráva o městu pochází z roku 1212.
Key services
municipal administration, public information dissemination, local regulations and ordinances, public service directories, event calendar, public tenders and contracts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Custom Search Engine, jQuery, Responsive Lightbox, Simple Job Board plugin, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent, Max Mega Menu, LSVR TownPress theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP, MySQL (implied by WordPress)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • GDPR cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for Ivančice city in Czech Republic.
  2. Content is comprehensive for local government services and information.
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented for GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. Website uses WordPress with multiple plugins and a commercial theme.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Contact phone number provided in structured data.
  10. External links mostly to official government or local service domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the LSVR TownPress theme and multiple plugins including WPBakery Page Builder, Simple Job Board, and GDPR Cookie Consent. It leverages Google Custom Search Engine for site search functionality and loads resources from trusted CDNs such as Cloudflare and Google Fonts. The hosting provider is likely WEDOS, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes basic accessibility features such as skip links. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by updating plugins regularly and improving security policy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ivancice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ivancice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.