Skip to main content

Security report for itrsonline.org

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. · Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Technical Rescue Symposium (ITRS) website represents a professional event platform focused on technical rescue disciplines, co-hosted by PMI and CMC. It targets rescue professionals and volunteers, offering event registration, ticket sales, and presentation proposal submissions. The site is well-branded and consistent with its niche market positioning, serving a specialized audience in the rescue and emergency response sector. The domain is well-established since 2008, registered to Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc., a US-based entity consistent with the event location and sponsors. Technically, the website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, integrating modern tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Ticket Tailor for ticketing. It uses HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, indicating room for security enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled, but missing DNSSEC and security headers reduce the overall security score. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Business credibility is strong with clear contact information, event details, and trusted partner links. Overall, the website is a credible and professional event platform with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itrsonline.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ITRS operates as a niche event symposium targeting rescue professionals, including fire departments, mountain rescue teams, and park personnel. Its business model revolves around annual event organization, ticket sales, and knowledge sharing through presentations. The partnership with PMI and CMC strengthens its market position and credibility. Revenue streams likely include registration fees and sponsorships. The presence of multiple co-sponsor organizations indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include ongoing event scheduling and active call for papers. The website supports user engagement via registration forms and ticket purchasing widgets, reflecting a digital-first approach to event management.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection (clientTransferProhibited) active. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are notable gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in security management. Forms are present but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident. The site does not expose sensitive data or credentials. Compliance gaps exist in privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques to prevent abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.
Description
The International Technical Rescue Symposium is a gathering of persons from across the spectrum of rescue disciplines to share news and views on advances in equipment and techniques, technical problems, and issues of mutual concern. Attendees are typically paid professionals or volunteer rescue personnel from fire departments, national and state parks, mountain rescue teams, and other similar organizations.
Key services
Annual symposium event, Presentation proposals, Ticket sales and registration, Grant information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda CMS scripts, Ticket Tailor widget, Google Maps API
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event site for International Technical Rescue Symposium 2025
  2. Uses Tilda CMS platform with integrated ticketing via Ticket Tailor
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  5. Domain is well aged and registered to a US company consistent with site content
  6. Site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC
  7. Includes social sharing buttons for Facebook and Twitter
  8. Contact phone number and physical address clearly displayed
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Ticket Tailor for ticketing integration. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Maps API for location display. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of maps. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itrsonline.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itrsonline.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.