Skip to main content

Security report for itreegroup.eu

iTree Group · Technology · Lithuania

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iTree Group is a medium-sized technology company specializing in software development, satellite and radar imaging, and GIS solutions primarily for public and private sectors. The company operates through subsidiaries in Lithuania and Poland and maintains a strong partnership with Oracle, supported by numerous professional certifications. Their business model focuses on custom software development, eGovernment portals, and advanced imaging technologies, serving a global client base. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and governance policies. Technically, the website is built using Mobirise Website Builder with Bootstrap and Angular.JS frameworks, leveraging modern technologies such as Kubernetes and cloud deployments. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation and content quality, though some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the company emphasizes compliance with ISO 27001:2022 and secure coding standards, but the website lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could be improved to enhance trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies, but the website content and certifications support legitimacy. Overall, the website scores well in content quality, business credibility, and security posture but could benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and technical security improvements. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and adding cookie consent mechanisms to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itreegroup.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iTree Group holds a solid market position as a specialized software and GIS solutions provider with a global footprint. Their competitive advantage lies in their certified expertise, long-term Oracle partnership, and focus on public sector and eGovernment projects. The business model is service-oriented with revenue streams from software development, maintenance, and imaging services. Target customers include government agencies and private sector clients requiring custom IT solutions. Growth indicators include a certified team of 70+ specialists and multiple international projects. The partnership ecosystem includes Oracle and various certification bodies, enhancing credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The company demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to ISO 27001:2022 and secure coding standards. The website does not expose sensitive data and shows no signs of vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. Data protection practices appear robust, supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR compliance. Incident response readiness and security culture could be improved by formalizing and publishing related policies and contact channels. Overall, the security posture is good but with room for enhancement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file, to improve transparency and security posture.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations and industry best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iTree Lietuva, UAB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iTree Group
Description
iTree Group is a family of software development companies providing custom development, e-services, satellite and radar image based monitoring, and GIS solutions for public and private sectors globally.
Key services
Custom software development, E-government portals, Satellite and radar imaging, GIS solutions, Database development and DBA services, Deployment and migration services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Oracle Java SE and EE, Angular.JS, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, Kubernetes, OpenGIS
Frameworks
Mobirise Website Builder v5.9.13, Bootstrap 5.1, Angular.JS proprietary frameworks
Platforms
Private infrastructure, Public and private clouds, Kubernetes microservices
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • ISO 27001:2022 compliance
  • Secure coding standards
  • Thorough testing
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  3. Strong emphasis on compliance with ISO standards and ethical business conduct.
  4. No cookie policy or consent mechanism detected.
  5. No visible security headers in HTML; SSL status unknown.
  6. No forms detected on the site; contact via email and phone only.
  7. No social media links found on the website.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Mobirise Website Builder, Bootstrap 5.1, Angular.JS, and backend technologies such as Oracle Java and PostgreSQL. Deployment supports private infrastructure and cloud environments with Kubernetes microservices. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation and content structure. However, no hosting provider information or performance metrics are available. SEO and accessibility are basic and could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent mechanisms, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itreegroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itreegroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.