Skip to main content

Security report for itms2014.sk

Government · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.itms2014.sk currently serves as an access point for the ITMS2014+ application, which appears to be a government-related service platform in Slovakia. The site is presently displaying an error message related to access infrastructure issues, limiting the availability of functional content. The target audience is likely government employees or public sector users who rely on this application for administrative or operational purposes. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on providing digital access to government services. From a technical perspective, the website is minimalistic with no detected advanced technologies, frameworks, or CMS platforms. The page is basic in design and mobile optimization is limited. There are no visible analytics or tracking technologies, and SEO optimization is poor. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, and no forms or interactive elements are present, indicating a low level of digital maturity. Security posture is weak based on the available data. There is no visible evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response documentation is present beyond a support email contact. The site does not appear to be protected by a WAF or similar security mechanism. The presence of an error message with an internal error ID exposed publicly could be improved to avoid potential information leakage. Overall, the website's risk is moderate due to limited security controls and lack of compliance documentation. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving error handling. Enhancing the technical infrastructure and user experience would also benefit the platform's reliability and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itms2014.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention itms2014.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
425
Employees
0
Customers
425
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for itms2014.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The ITMS2014+ platform is positioned as a government service tool in Slovakia, likely supporting administrative or funding management processes. The business model is service-based, targeting public sector users. The lack of visible marketing or commercial content suggests a non-commercial or publicly funded operation. The absence of detailed company information or certifications limits insight into competitive advantages or growth indicators. The partnership ecosystem includes datacentrum.sk, which appears to provide support services. The platform's operations are likely critical for government workflows, but the current error state may impact user trust and operational continuity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement confirmation and security headers, which are fundamental for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, though a support email is provided for reporting issues. The exposure of an internal error ID in the public-facing error message could be a minor information disclosure risk. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evidenced by any policy documents. Incident response readiness appears minimal, relying on email contact rather than structured processes. Overall, the security culture and practices require significant improvement to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance and transparency.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response plan to improve security posture and user trust.
  5. Improve error handling to avoid exposing internal error identifiers or sensitive information publicly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be related to the ITMS2014+ application, likely a government or public sector service platform. The content indicates an error message related to access infrastructure for the application.
Key services
Access to ITMS2014+ application
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website currently displays an error message indicating access infrastructure issues for the ITMS2014+ application.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  3. Contact email for support is provided: itms@datacentrum.sk.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected on the page.
  5. Minimal content and no SEO or analytics scripts detected.
  6. No social media or phone contact information found.
  7. No security headers or advanced security practices visible in the HTML.
  8. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with minimal HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected. The page is moderately performant but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is poor due to minimal meta tags and no structured data. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. The technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience, security, and compliance. The current technical risks include lack of HTTPS confirmation and absence of security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itms2014.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itms2014.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.