Skip to main content

Security report for itlabslv.com

ItLabs22 · Technology · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITLABS22 is a small technology company specializing in digital marketing and IT solutions, offering services such as multi-channel CPC advertising, social media marketing, ad spend optimization, influencer marketing, CRM, and brand reputation building. The company positions itself as a region-leading provider of cost-effective digital marketing solutions, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their marketing efforts. The website is built on WordPress and uses common plugins like Contact Form 7 for data collection via forms. The technical infrastructure is moderate with some outdated components such as an old jQuery version, which may pose security risks. The site is mobile optimized and presents content clearly with good navigation and professional design. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is partial with privacy and cookie policies present but no consent mechanism. Contact information is limited to forms without direct emails or phone numbers. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve security and privacy practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itlabslv.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
43
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention itlabslv.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for itlabslv.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the digital marketing sector, providing a range of marketing services to businesses. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering marketing solutions and IT support, alongside job vacancy listings for specialists. The market positioning as a region-leading provider suggests a competitive stance in its niche. The absence of direct contact details and limited transparency in registrant data may affect customer trust. The company leverages WordPress for its web presence, indicating a cost-effective and flexible approach. Growth indicators include active job vacancy postings and a clear service portfolio. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4) introduces potential vulnerabilities. Forms are secured with required fields but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection. There are no published security policies or incident response contacts, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial with privacy policies present but no explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture requires improvements to reduce risk and enhance compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ItLabs22
Description
ITLABS22 offers IT and marketing solutions, including digital marketing services such as multi-channel CPC advertising, social media marketing, ad spend optimization, influencer marketing, CRM, and brand reputation building. They also provide job vacancies for specialists.
Key services
Multi-Channel CPC Advertising, Social Media Marketing, Ad Spend Optimization, Influencer Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, Brand Reputation Building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, WordPress 5.3.18, Contact Form 7 plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Multi-Channel CPC Advertising, Social Media Marketing, Ad Spend Optimization, Influencer Marketing, Customer Relationship Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Contact Form 7 plugin.
  3. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Outdated jQuery version may pose security risks.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  9. Website content is professionally presented and relevant to digital marketing services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.18 with the Contact Form 7 plugin for form handling. It uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and may expose the site to security risks. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and WordPress core domains. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic with some semantic HTML but no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility features. The technical stack is typical for small business websites but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itlabslv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itlabslv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.