Skip to main content

Security report for itinforma.se

IT informa AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

27/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IT informa AB is a small Swedish IT consulting company specializing in the development and maintenance of business-critical IT systems. Their website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services, regional focus in the Öresund area, and a consistent brand presence. The company leverages WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Astra theme to deliver a well-structured and SEO-optimized site. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports their business credibility. Technically, the site is well implemented with HTTPS and modern web standards, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved with additional policies and headers. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, indicating legitimacy and consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itinforma.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
27

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market focusing on business-critical IT systems, providing consulting and service teams to ensure high availability and quality. Their business model is service-based consulting with a regional focus, targeting businesses requiring robust IT system development and maintenance. The website content and social media links suggest an established but small operation with a professional approach. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. The company appears to maintain a trustworthy and consistent brand image with clear contact information and active updates about personnel and projects.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which is a significant gap under GDPR. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface, but also limiting direct user data collection. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Add an incident response contact or security@ email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit plugins and themes for vulnerabilities and keep them updated.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IT informa AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IT informa AB
Description
We provide the key competences that are required for developing and maintaining business-critical systems. We help our customers to develop and manage business-critical IT systems, quality systems and development processes. Our office is located in Lund, Sweden, and we operate primarily in the Öresund region.
Key services
Consulting with key competences for business-critical systems, Development and management of business-critical IT systems, Service teams for project and service deliverance, Non-functional requirements consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, UAGB (Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg), Astra theme and Astra child theme, SVG icons, WPO Minify plugin
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding.
  2. Content focuses on business-critical IT consulting services with regional focus in Sweden.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; contact is via email and phone links.
  6. Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and themes with SEO optimization via Yoast.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using the Astra theme and child theme, enhanced with Yoast SEO and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg. The site uses minification plugins for CSS and JS to improve performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. No major technical errors or broken elements were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. Accessibility is basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small consulting firm.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itinforma.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itinforma.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.