Skip to main content

Security report for itineris.co.uk

Itineris Limited · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Itineris Limited is a well-established digital marketing agency based in London, UK, founded in 2001. The company specializes in WordPress development for business, paid media, SEO, branding, and web development services. It has a strong market position supported by over 5,000 businesses served and multiple industry awards and partner certifications, including Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Kinsta. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for consent management, leveraging Google Tag Manager and jQuery. The site demonstrates fast performance, good accessibility, and strong SEO practices. Hosting details are not explicitly stated but inferred to be professional and reliable given partner badges. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent mechanisms, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security headers are not visible in the HTML content and could be improved. No vulnerabilities or critical security issues were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR-aligned consent. Overall, Itineris presents a credible, trustworthy, and professional digital marketing agency with a mature digital infrastructure and good security posture. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a security policy, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to sustain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itineris.co.uk

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention itineris.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
166
Employees
8
Customers
32
Third parties
126
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-01-10 · 11 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for itineris.co.uk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –wordpressmanagement.itineris.co.uk2026-01-10
  • –wordpressmanagement.itineris.co.uk2025-07-26
  • –www.itineris.co.uk2025-07-26
  • –wordpressmanagement.itineris.co.uk2025-07-26
  • –itineris.co.uk2025-07-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Itineris operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital marketing services for education, non-profit, legal/accountancy, and professional services sectors. Its business model centers on providing tailored digital marketing solutions including strategy, branding, web design, paid media, and organic growth. The company leverages partnerships with major technology providers and maintains a strong reputation through awards and client testimonials. The target audience includes businesses seeking to enhance their online presence and marketing effectiveness. The company size is medium, with 11-50 employees, and it has a stable market presence since 2001. The partnership ecosystem includes Google, Meta, Microsoft, and Kinsta, indicating strong industry integration.

Security posture

The security maturity of Itineris is good, with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses modern tracking and analytics tools responsibly. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly visible and should be verified or implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which are recommended for transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but can be improved with formalized policies and header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance user trust by showcasing security certifications or compliance attestations if available.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Itineris Limited
VAT number
GB776958845
Registration number
04285360
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Itineris Limited
Description
Itineris specialises in WordPress for Business, Paid Media and SEO that grows brands online with expert web development and digital marketing
Key services
Strategy & Transformation, Experience & Brand, Web Design & Development, Measurement & Insights, Paid Media, Organic (SEO and Content Marketing)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Cookiebot Consent Management
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security storage consent only in Google Analytics config

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms (Facebook Ads)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and granular controls
  2. Strong presence of industry certifications and partner badges
  3. Multiple customer testimonials with company logos and names
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Clear contact information with physical address, email, and phone
  6. No visible security or privacy policy gaps
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization and Cookiebot for consent management. It uses Google Tag Manager and jQuery for analytics and interactivity. The site is well-structured with valid HTML and CSS, optimized for fast loading and excellent mobile responsiveness. Accessibility features are present, and SEO meta tags are comprehensive. Hosting is likely professional and reliable, supported by partner badges. The technical infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience and strong digital maturity, though explicit security header implementation should be confirmed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itineris.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itineris.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.