Skip to main content

Security report for iteo.dk

Iteo · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iteo is a Danish IT solutions provider specializing in IT infrastructure, security, and hosting services primarily targeted at the education sector. Established in 2001, the company has a longstanding presence in the market, offering tailored IT solutions to educational institutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and SEO optimization, leveraging WordPress with modern plugins and themes. Technically, the site uses a solid technology stack including WordPress, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the business claims, supporting trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iteo.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iteo.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for iteo.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iteo operates as an essential entity within the technology sector, focusing on IT solutions for education. Its business model revolves around providing IT infrastructure and security services, positioning itself as a specialist in this niche. The company targets educational institutions and related organizations, leveraging partnerships and digital marketing tools like Google Tag Manager for analytics. The website's content and structured data indicate a clear market positioning with a focus on IT security and hosting. While the company appears small in size, its domain age and consistent branding suggest stability. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The absence of detailed contact information such as phone numbers or physical addresses may limit direct customer engagement but is partially mitigated by contact forms and email presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicate room for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and readiness in case of security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further limits the security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is functional but basic, requiring enhancements to align with best practices and compliance standards like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information transparency by adding phone numbers and physical addresses where applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iteo
Description
IT-løsninger til undervisning
Key services
IT infrastructure, IT security, Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.1.3, LayerSlider, Slider Revolution, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. Contact information includes email and contact form but no phone number or physical address explicitly found
  5. Website uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization
  6. Security practices are basic but could be improved with additional headers and policies
  7. WHOIS data supports a legitimate and established business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins including LayerSlider and Slider Revolution for visual content. It employs Bootstrap 4.1.3 and jQuery for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, alongside Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with Yoast and Rank Math plugins and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with some caching and minification evident. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and potential risk. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from security hardening and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iteo.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iteo.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.