Skip to main content

Security report for iteanova.com

ITeanova · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITeanova is a specialized SAP consulting and development company focusing on production planning and S/4HANA embedded PP/DS solutions. Positioned as an SAP Silver Partner, they serve businesses needing tailored SAP software adaptations to optimize planning and production processes. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeting business clients in manufacturing and technology sectors. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Tawk.to live chat, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Privacy compliance is well addressed through a comprehensive privacy policy and an express cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information are lacking. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iteanova.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iteanova.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for iteanova.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology and manufacturing sectors, offering essential SAP consulting and development services. Their business model centers on providing customized SAP solutions, leveraging their SAP Silver Partner status as a competitive advantage. The presence of reputable client logos indicates a strong partnership ecosystem and market trust. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise focused on quality and specialized services rather than volume. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly with privacy considerations. No direct revenue streams or pricing models are disclosed, consistent with a B2B consulting approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The use of cookie consent and privacy policy indicates awareness of GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in security transparency and readiness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. Third-party scripts are used extensively, which requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts and procedures.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for improved compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ITeanova
Description
ITeanova specializes in SAP solutions, development, and consulting. They offer services in production planning, S/4HANA embedded PP/DS, and more. Their solutions adapt SAP software to business needs.
Key services
SAP consulting, SAP development, Production planning solutions, S/4HANA embedded PP/DS, SAP software adaptation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Tawk.to live chat, TermsFeed cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by Google Tag Manager and external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-859185002)
Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
Tawk.to live chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with express consent.
  3. Privacy policy and data protection pages present and linked.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage HTML.
  5. Multiple reputable client logos displayed indicating business credibility.
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and external trusted scripts.
  10. Good SEO and accessibility basics implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, JavaScript for interactivity, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for marketing insights. The presence of Tawk.to live chat enhances user engagement. Performance is moderate with some deferred loading of video content and asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for media. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of visible security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iteanova.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iteanova.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.