Skip to main content

Security report for itcentrs.lv

SIA IT Centrs · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA IT Centrs is a Latvian cybersecurity consulting company established in 2000, specializing in information system security consulting, audits, penetration testing, and training including ethical hacking courses. The company positions itself as a trusted local expert with certified consultants holding recognized industry certifications such as CISA, CISSP, and CEH. The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging standard web technologies and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. It is secured with HTTPS and HSTS, reflecting good SSL practices. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No social media presence is linked, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, indicating areas for improvement in transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itcentrs.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention itcentrs.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for itcentrs.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and organizations requiring cybersecurity consulting and training services. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering expert advice and education in information security. The firm maintains a consistent brand presence and provides clear contact details, enhancing credibility. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains suggests a focused, standalone operation. The use of industry-standard certifications by consultants is a competitive advantage. Growth potential may be enhanced by expanding digital presence and formalizing security and privacy policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, reducing risks of interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The absence of additional security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but no apparent security risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing comprehensive security policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and monitor for security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA IT Centrs
VAT number
LV40003481064
Registration number
40003481064
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA IT Centrs
Description
SIA IT Centrs, founded in 2000, provides internet security consulting services including information system security consultations, audits, penetration testing, and training on information security and ethical hacking.
Key services
Information system security consulting, Security audits, Penetration testing, Information security training, Ethical hacking courses
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts (Poppins, Roboto), Squarespace JavaScript libraries
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with standard templates and scripts.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie banner is present and functional with opt-in consent mechanism.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent across page and structured data.
  5. Consultants hold recognized security certifications, enhancing trust.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No social media links detected on the website.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with HSTS enabled, indicating good SSL configuration.
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, utilizing its built-in CMS and infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site loads multiple compressed JavaScript bundles from Squarespace's CDN, indicating a modern but template-based technical stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced SEO features. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA and skip links but could be improved. The technical implementation is solid for a small business website but limited by the constraints of the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itcentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itcentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.