Skip to main content

Security report for ita-labs.com

ITA Labs · Technology · Russia

Partial score · DNS & email only

43/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITA Labs is a specialized custom software development company focusing on high-load distributed client-server systems primarily using .NET technologies. They serve a diverse international clientele including government agencies and corporations across Russia, USA, Europe, and Africa. Their key services include application servers, IoT services, smart bots, management portals, SDKs, and software protection solutions. Technically, the website is built on Bitrix CMS with custom JavaScript and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security deficiency. The security posture is weak with minimal security headers and no modern TLS protocols enabled. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and privacy policy present but no GDPR-specific indicators or terms of service. Business credibility is supported by consistent WHOIS data, clear contact information, and multiple trust badges from industry platforms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ita-labs.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
43

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ITA Labs positions itself as an experienced provider of complex custom software solutions with a focus on high-load and distributed systems. Their competitive advantage lies in deep technical expertise in .NET and related technologies, a broad service portfolio, and a global client base. The business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises and government clients needing tailored software. The company has maintained a consistent market presence since 2004, supported by industry recognitions and partnerships such as Microsoft. Their marketing leverages social media and industry directories to build credibility. Growth potential exists through expanding IoT and smart bot offerings. However, the lack of visible incident response and security policies may impact trust with security-conscious clients.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. The server supports no TLS protocols and lacks strong cipher suites, HSTS, and OCSP stapling. Security headers are minimal, limited to a Content-Security-Policy enforcing upgrade-insecure-requests. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is present but GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. These gaps represent significant risks for data protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  3. Configure server to support modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and above) and strong cipher suites.
  4. Add comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Publish a security.txt file detailing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  6. Enhance privacy compliance by updating the privacy policy with GDPR-specific information and adding a terms of service page.
  7. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bitrix CMS with custom JavaScript and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. The tech stack for services includes .NET Framework, WCF, TCP/IP, and MS SQL Server, indicating a mature backend infrastructure. However, the website performance metrics are missing or zero, suggesting incomplete monitoring or slow loading. The site is not optimized for mobile devices beyond basic levels and has only basic accessibility features. The lack of HTTPS and modern TLS support is a critical technical debt. The use of WiX for installation packages and SDK development indicates a focus on Windows platform solutions. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for backend services but the web presence requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ita-labs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ita-labs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.