Skip to main content

Security report for isss.cz

ISSS · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ISSS.cz is a well-established conference website focused on eGovernment and digitalization of public administration in the Czech Republic. Founded in 1998, it serves as a platform for experts and significant guests to discuss and promote digital transformation in government services. The website reflects a stable market position with a medium-sized audience primarily composed of professionals in the public sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, utilizing modern tools such as Cookiebot for GDPR compliance and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data to enhance SEO. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear cookie policies and consent dialogs. Business credibility is supported by the domain's long history and consistent registration data. Overall, ISSS.cz presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for its niche audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of isss.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching isss.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ISSS operates as an important entity in the government sector, organizing conferences that facilitate knowledge sharing and networking around eGovernment initiatives. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing tradition and stable participation of experts. The business model revolves around event organization and thought leadership in digital public services. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, registrations, and partnerships. The target customer segment includes government officials, IT professionals, and policy makers. The partnership ecosystem includes major technology and media providers, as evidenced by integrations with Google, Vimeo, Twitter, and YouTube. Strategic observations suggest maintaining and expanding digital engagement and enhancing security transparency could further strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a robust cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident and should be implemented to harden defenses. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security policies and headers to mitigate advanced threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, ideally with a security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Maintain regular audits of third-party scripts and update them to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ISSS
Description
Konference ISSS se zabývá digitalizací veřejné správy a rozvojem eGovernmentu. ISSS má dlouhou tradici a stabilní účast odborníků a významných hostů.
Key services
Organizace konference ISSS, Podpora digitalizace veřejné správy, Platforma pro odbornou diskusi a networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Alpine.js
Frameworks
WordPress theme framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for script management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Twitter pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional conference site focused on eGovernment and digitalization.
  2. Uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization info.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains (Google, Vimeo, Twitter, YouTube).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a custom theme, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Alpine.js and Swiper.js for interactivity and UI components. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing scripts. The site is hosted with a provider linked to the registrar REG-WEBGLOBE and uses name servers from Ignum. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Technical debt appears low, but there is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization in security and compliance transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with isss.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review isss.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.