Skip to main content

Security report for irian.com

Irian Solutions Softwareentwicklungs GmbH · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Irian Solutions Softwareentwicklungs GmbH is a medium-sized Austrian technology company specializing in software development and digital solutions using Java, Angular, and .NET technologies. With over 20 years of experience, the company serves a B2B market, providing digital product development, data and AI solutions, and technology expert staffing. Their client portfolio includes major enterprises such as Allianz, BMW, and Deutsche Börse Group, positioning them as a reputable player in the software development sector. The website is professionally designed, multilingual (German and English), and showcases detailed project case studies and client logos, enhancing credibility. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks like Astro and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, performance is slow with a large page size and high load time. Mobile optimization and SEO are good, but accessibility is basic. Hosting and DNS services are managed via Cloudflare, but the SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, with no valid certificate or HTTPS enabled, exposing the site to security risks. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS, lack of security headers, no DMARC or DNSSEC, and absence of published security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism in place. Business credibility is strong based on content quality, client trust signals, and professional presentation. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy business but requires urgent security improvements, especially SSL/TLS implementation, to protect users and enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include securing the website with valid certificates, enabling security headers, and publishing security policies to improve compliance and risk management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching irian.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Irian Solutions operates in the competitive software development market, focusing on digital transformation and cloud-native solutions. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting enterprises needing custom software and technology expertise. The company leverages long-term client relationships with high-profile customers, indicating stable revenue streams and market trust. Their multilingual presence and geographic locations in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and Romania suggest a regional European focus with potential for expansion. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies indicates an independent operation. The company’s strategic advantage lies in its technical expertise and established client base, but growth could be enhanced by expanding digital marketing and security transparency.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, which is a critical vulnerability. The lack of security headers and email authentication records (DMARC) further weakens the security posture. No incident response or security policies are publicly available, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, the missing encryption and security controls expose the business to interception and trust issues. GDPR compliance is supported by cookie consent and privacy policy, but technical security gaps must be addressed to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies, including contact channels for security incidents.
  4. Set up and enforce DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records to protect email communications.
  5. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend framework (Astro) and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The DNS and mail services are managed by Cloudflare, indicating reliable infrastructure. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is missing, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a major technical flaw. The site has a large page size (~589 KB) and slow load time (~31.7 seconds), indicating performance optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness and SEO are well implemented, but accessibility features are basic. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with irian.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review irian.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.