Skip to main content

Security report for ipweb.pro

IPweb · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IPweb is an established microtask and promotion platform that facilitates website traffic improvement, social media engagement, and marketplace sales enhancement. It serves a broad audience including content creators, businesses, marketers, and advertising agencies. The platform offers a variety of services such as marketplace promotion, social media campaigns, app promotion, and review generation, supported by a Telegram bot and a web interface. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting multiple languages and social media integration. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and FontAwesome, with performance and mobile optimization rated as good. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers implementation. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of WHOIS transparency, are notable gaps in compliance and trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but missing security headers and formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Customer reviews and social media presence provide trust signals, but the lack of WHOIS data transparency reduces overall domain trust. The site content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit material detected. Overall, IPweb presents a solid business platform with good technical implementation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipweb.pro

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IPweb operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, positioning itself as a microtask and promotion exchange platform. It leverages a business model connecting advertisers, agencies, and individual performers to execute marketing tasks. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its wide range of engagement tools, multi-language support, and integration with popular social media and marketplaces. Revenue streams likely include fees for promotion services and affiliate programs. The target customer segments include content creators, businesses, marketers, and digital agencies worldwide. Growth indicators include over 1 million users and active social media channels. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and identity.digital for domain registration services. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved compliance and security transparency to enhance market credibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of IPweb is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of formal security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and readiness. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The security culture appears informal with no explicit frameworks or certifications mentioned. Business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory risks and reduced user trust. Enhancing security posture through policy publication, header implementation, and compliance improvements is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a clear security incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all audiences.
  5. Increase WHOIS data transparency or provide verified domain registration information to boost domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IPweb
Description
IPweb is a promotion service and micro-tasks exchange platform that helps improve website traffic, increase sales on marketplaces, and gain subscribers. It offers tools for creating and performing tasks with convenient withdrawal options.
Key services
Marketplace promotion, Social media promotion, Website traffic improvement, App promotion, Review generation, Other microtask services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Swiper.js, Vanilla JS, Cookies.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Telegram Bot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Telegram bot, Microtask platform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a microtask and promotion platform targeting advertisers, agencies, and performers.
  2. Content is well-structured with multiple language options and social media integration.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML content; security posture could be improved.
  6. Customer reviews and social media links add trust signals.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. JavaScript libraries such as vanilla.js and js.cookie.min.js are used for client-side functionality and cookie management. The site supports multiple languages and currencies, indicating a mature internationalization approach. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and stylesheets, but no explicit performance optimization metrics are available. The site is mobile-optimized with a Telegram bot integration for additional platform access. Technical debt is minimal based on visible code, but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance indicates areas for modernization. Technical risks include potential regulatory non-compliance and security vulnerabilities due to missing best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipweb.pro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipweb.pro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.