Skip to main content

Security report for iphh.de

Internet Port Hamburg GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Internet Port Hamburg GmbH (IPHH) is a medium-sized German company founded in 1996, specializing in providing colocation, housing, managed services, and IP/fiber optic connectivity exclusively to business customers. Positioned as a reliable full-service provider, IPHH emphasizes personalized service, technical excellence, and compliance with industry standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and Health Data Hosting (HDS) certifications. Their business model focuses on B2B enterprise clients requiring secure and customized data center solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and detailed service offerings. Technically, the website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS and utilizes modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swipe.js, and Colorbox for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and moderate performance. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate for the target audience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The security posture is bolstered by the company's ISO certifications and clear emphasis on data center security. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website and business present a trustworthy and professional image with room for technical and compliance enhancements. Strategically, IPHH should verify and publish domain registration details, implement cookie consent mechanisms, and provide clear incident response contacts to strengthen security culture and regulatory compliance. These steps will improve customer trust and align with best practices in data protection and cybersecurity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iphh.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IPHH operates in the competitive data center and telecommunications sector in Germany, targeting enterprise customers with tailored infrastructure and managed services. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized service, technical expertise, and compliance with recognized standards. Revenue streams likely include colocation fees, managed service contracts, and consulting. The company maintains partnerships, such as being a Portus Data Centers Company subsidiary, and leverages certifications to differentiate itself. Growth indicators include recent ISO transitions and infrastructure upgrades. The company ecosystem includes a customer portal and multiple data center locations, supporting scalability and service diversity.

Security posture

IPHH demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO/IEC 27001:2013 and 2022 certifications and Health Data Hosting compliance, indicating strong information security management. The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information suggest areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The company should enhance transparency by publishing security contact channels and adopting security.txt or similar standards to improve incident handling readiness and customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Internet Port Hamburg GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Internet Port Hamburg GmbH
Description
Internet Port Hamburg offers colocation, housing, managed services as well as IP and fibre optic connections exclusively to business customers. Founded in 1996, it provides server hosting, domain management, consulting, and Linux support.
Key services
Colocation, Housing, Managed Services, IP and fibre optic connections, Domain management, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swipe.js, Colorbox, Tablesorter, Isotope, Themify Icons, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data missing or domain not found in registry
  4. Strong focus on B2B data center and network services
  5. Good use of modern web technologies and CMS
  6. Certifications and compliance information prominently displayed
  7. Contact info and corporate address clearly provided
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  9. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure info
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao CMS with a modern JavaScript tech stack including jQuery and UI libraries for interactive elements. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses CSS preloading for performance. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. No hosting provider details were found. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security headers and cookie management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iphh.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iphh.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.