Skip to main content

Security report for ioe-emp.org

International Organisation of Employers · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The International Organisation of Employers (IOE) is a well-established global network representing over 150 employer and business organizations across more than 140 countries. Founded in 1920 and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, IOE serves as a powerful and balanced voice for business at the international level, advocating on social and employment policies and engaging with major international organizations. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multilingual support, and comprehensive content including news, events, policy priorities, and business networks. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging modern web technologies and standard analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, although security headers could be improved and explicit incident response information is absent. Overall, the website and organization demonstrate a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness. The lack of WHOIS registrant data is mitigated by the organization's nature and consistent contact information. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure details, and maintaining ongoing audits of third-party scripts to sustain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ioe-emp.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IOE holds a dominant position as the largest global private sector network representing employers, targeting business organizations, policymakers, and international institutions. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on advocacy, policy influence, and providing networking platforms. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and partnerships. The organization maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with international bodies such as the ILO, UN, and regional groups. Growth indicators include active event participation and publication of joint reports. The website supports these operations with multilingual content and resource centers, enhancing global reach and engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts necessitates regular security audits. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and vulnerability reporting channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including a security.txt file.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and update privacy notices accordingly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
International Organisation of Employers
Description
The IOE is the largest network of the private sector in the world, with more than 150 business and employer organisation members.
Key services
Advocacy on social and employment policy, Engagement with international organizations, Business networks facilitation, Resource center with publications and multimedia
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Widgets
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and multilingual support is provided.
  3. Strong presence on major social media platforms.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, but no suspicious indicators found.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. Use of modern CMS (TYPO3) and standard analytics/tracking tools.
  9. Contact information is clear and includes physical address, phone, and email.
  10. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and scalable content management system suitable for enterprise and international organizations. It uses modern web fonts, asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts, and a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script optimization and caching. The site architecture supports multilingual content and structured navigation, enhancing user experience. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring to prevent vulnerabilities. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified but the site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate, indicating a secure hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ioe-emp.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ioe-emp.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.