Skip to main content

Security report for inwestycjejst.pl

Government · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website inwestycjejst.pl serves as a modern portal designed to present investment offers for local government units (Gminy) in Poland. It provides a simple, intuitive, and graphically customizable platform available in multiple languages and compliant with PAIH standards. The business targets municipalities and investors, positioning itself as a niche service provider in the government technology sector. The domain is registered with a reputable Polish registrar and has been active since 2018, aligning well with the business's operational timeline. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and Google Fonts, with no detected CMS or complex frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured content. However, accessibility features are basic, and no advanced technical frameworks or analytics tools are detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The domain uses HTTPS (assumed from URL), but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices. The overall risk assessment suggests a legitimate and professionally presented business with minor compliance and security shortcomings. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and establishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response protocols to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inwestycjejst.pl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Inwestycjejst.pl operates within the government and technology sectors, focusing on providing digital tools for local governments to showcase investment opportunities. Its business model revolves around offering a specialized SaaS portal tailored to municipalities and investors. The company maintains partnerships with related entities such as innowacyjnejst.pl and euroinnowacje.com, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, targeting a niche market segment. Revenue streams likely derive from service subscriptions or licensing to local governments. The company appears small-sized, founded in 2018, with a clear focus on innovation in public sector investment promotion.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate with notable gaps. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information highlight compliance and security weaknesses. While HTTPS is presumably used, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security frameworks are referenced. These factors increase risk exposure, particularly regarding GDPR compliance and protection against DNS attacks. The business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory penalties and reduced user trust. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices suggests room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Proste i intuicyjne narzędzie, personalizowane graficznie, dostępne w dwóch językach i zgodne ze standardami PAIH
Key services
Investment offer presentation portal, Graphical personalization, Multilingual support, Compliance with PAIH standards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Playfair Display, Roboto)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; minimal data collection observed.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Website uses Google Fonts and custom CSS; no CMS or JavaScript frameworks detected.
  7. Partner and provider logos indicate a small ecosystem of related entities.
  8. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected from provided data.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate with no privacy protection.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies without reliance on heavy frameworks or CMS platforms, which reduces complexity but may limit scalability. The use of Google Fonts and minified CSS indicates some attention to performance and aesthetics. Hosting is provided by home.pl S.A., a known Polish hosting provider. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and responsive design elements. However, the lack of advanced analytics or tracking tools suggests limited data-driven insights. There is an opportunity to enhance accessibility and implement modern frontend frameworks to improve user experience and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inwestycjejst.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inwestycjejst.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.