Skip to main content

Security report for intrapoint.se

Other · Sweden

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

29/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website intrapoint.se appears to be a small-scale content site focused on providing information about office accessories and legal advice, particularly related to family law and legal preparations for property division. The site targets office workers and professionals in Sweden, offering basic informational articles and navigation to legal topics. The technical infrastructure is built on standard web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, with moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO features. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or advanced platform integrations. Security posture is weak due to the apparent lack of HTTPS, security headers, and absence of privacy or cookie policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided, which limits trust and compliance with GDPR. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professional security and privacy practices, which poses risks for user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intrapoint.se

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
29

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intrapoint.se operates as an informational website with a focus on office-related content and legal advice, particularly family law. The business model seems to be content-driven, possibly monetized through indirect means such as referrals or advertising, though no ads or affiliate programs are detected. The market position is unclear but likely small and niche within Sweden. The site does not provide detailed company information or contact details, limiting transparency. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential may be limited without enhanced content, security, and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response contacts. The absence of these elements indicates poor compliance with GDPR and general web security best practices. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy documentation to improve trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  3. Publish clear contact information including email and phone for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Upptäck vårt breda utbud av kontorsaccessoarer för att hålla kontoret rent, organiseret och bekvämt.
Key services
office accessories information, legal advice articles (family law, advokatbodelning)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.3.1, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Font Awesome 4.7.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. Site uses common web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  6. Content is minimal and focused on office accessories and legal advice articles.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) or forms detected.
  8. Social media icons present but no explicit external social media URLs.
  9. No evidence of advertising or analytics services detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a standard front-end stack with Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.3.1, AOS for animations, and Font Awesome icons. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. No CMS or backend technologies are detected. The site lacks advanced SEO features and accessibility enhancements. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data, limiting full technical assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intrapoint.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intrapoint.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.