Skip to main content

Security report for intrac.lv

INTRAC LATVIJA SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INTRAC LATVIJA SIA is a medium-sized Latvian company specializing in the sales and after-sales service of industrial and agricultural machinery, targeting sectors such as forestry, agriculture, construction, and industry. The company holds a leading market position in Latvia for the products it represents and maintains a network of sister companies in neighboring Baltic countries. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear product categorization and comprehensive contact information. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics, with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms. The cookie consent mechanism indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and accessibility features, and mobile optimization is basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO and technical modernization. Security posture is generally good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of security headers and limited security policy information suggest areas for enhancement. Privacy compliance is addressed through cookie consent and a privacy policy, though GDPR compliance could be further strengthened with explicit data retention disclosures. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, but the lack of WHOIS data due to query limits reduces confidence in domain registration transparency. Strategic improvements in security headers, accessibility, and technical modernization are recommended to enhance the site's security and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intrac.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention intrac.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18
Employees
2
Customers
3
Third parties
13
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-08-02 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for intrac.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –shop.intrac.lv2025-08-02
  • –shop.intrac.lv2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INTRAC LATVIJA SIA operates in a competitive industrial and agricultural machinery market in Latvia, leveraging partnerships with global brands such as John Deere, Case, Massey Ferguson, Manitou, and Bomag. The company’s business model focuses on B2B sales, after-sales service, and spare parts supply, targeting professional clients in forestry, agriculture, construction, and industrial sectors. The presence of sister companies in Lithuania, Estonia, and Sweden indicates a regional group structure, enhancing market reach and resource sharing. The company maintains an e-commerce platform for product sales and actively engages customers via multiple social media channels. Growth indicators include participation in international exhibitions and a diversified product portfolio. The company’s strategic partnerships and comprehensive service offerings position it well for sustained market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented in forms, reducing risks of common web attacks. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response information is provided, which could impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing recommended security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  4. Optimize mobile responsiveness and site performance for better engagement.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INTRAC LATVIJA SIA
VAT number
LV40003227920
Registration number
40003227920
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INTRAC LATVIJA SIA
Description
SIA INTRAC Latvija is a company engaged in sales and after-sales service of industrial and agricultural machinery in Latvia. Their clients operate in forestry, agriculture, construction, and industrial sectors. They cooperate with leading global machinery suppliers and provide qualified technical personnel services. INTRAC Latvija is a leading company in its market segments.
Key services
Sales of forestry machinery, Sales of construction machinery, Sales of lifting equipment, Sales of agricultural machinery, After-sales service and technical support, Spare parts supply, Special offers, Used machinery sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or security challenge blocking content.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and includes CSRF tokens in forms.
  4. Cookie consent banner and settings are implemented, indicating privacy compliance efforts.
  5. Multiple social media channels and partner links are present, supporting business legitimacy.
  6. No explicit security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure pages found.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  8. Website content is primarily in Latvian with options for Russian and English.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags detected in the HTML head.
  10. Technical stack includes jQuery, Google Analytics, and Slick Slider.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking and user interaction. The presence of Slick Slider indicates use of common UI components. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and limited accessibility features. SEO is basic with minimal meta descriptions and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL but lacks advanced security headers. Cookie consent and CSRF tokens indicate attention to privacy and security basics. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO with structured data, and enhance performance and accessibility to reduce technical debt and improve business continuity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intrac.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intrac.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.