Skip to main content

Security report for into.co.uk

Into Lighting · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Into Lighting is a well-established UK-based multidisciplinary lighting design consultancy with over 45 years of experience. The company specializes in providing innovative lighting solutions tailored to architects, interior designers, and clients across various sectors including real estate, hospitality, retail, and other industries. Their business model offers flexible appointment options, including fee-based consultancy and design plus supply management, supported by global partnerships in key regions such as Germany, Dubai, Hong Kong, and the USA. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed portfolio and accreditations, including ISO certifications, reinforcing their market position as a trusted lighting design partner. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and LiteSpeed Cache, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, some technical improvements are recommended, such as implementing security headers and a cookie consent mechanism to enhance privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of security headers and lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to a Nominet UK naming rules error, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the legitimacy of the business as presented on the website. Overall, Into Lighting presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business credibility and good technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, privacy compliance, and publishing security policies to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching into.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Into Lighting operates in a niche consultancy market focused on lighting design, serving architects, interior designers, and clients globally. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive experience, ISO certifications, and flexible service offerings that include both design consultancy and supply management. The company leverages strategic partnerships internationally to extend their market reach. Revenue streams likely derive from consultancy fees and project-based design and supply contracts. The target customer segments are professional design and construction firms requiring specialized lighting solutions. Growth indicators include a well-maintained portfolio and active online presence. The partnership ecosystem includes LinkedIn and Pinterest for professional networking and marketing. The company maintains a focused operational model without visible subsidiaries or parent company affiliations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates standard tracking practices with moderate user tracking. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and lack of a cookie consent mechanism, represent compliance gaps especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that could affect trust but may be due to technical or registry-specific issues rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct a WHOIS domain registration review to resolve the naming rules error and improve domain registration transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
M.I.G Ltd company number 01413018 T/A into lighting
Registration number
01413018
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Into Lighting
Description
Into Lighting is an award-winning multidisciplinary lighting design consultancy with over 45 years of experience. They specialize in collaborating with architects, interior designers, and clients to create innovative and effective lighting solutions tailored to diverse project needs.
Key services
Lighting design consultancy, Lighting design and supply management, Project-specific tailored lighting solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Elementor, LiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and well-structured content focused on lighting design consultancy.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content; contact is via contact page form.
  4. Privacy policy is present but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. ISO certifications prominently displayed indicating quality management and environmental standards.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. Use of modern CMS (WordPress) with Elementor and LiteSpeed cache for performance.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible, which is a notable anomaly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. It incorporates standard JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking user interactions. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. No hosting provider information is explicitly detected from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business presence but requires updates to align with best practices in security and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with into.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review into.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.