Skip to main content

Security report for intility.com

Intility · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intility is a well-established Norwegian technology company founded in 2000, specializing in providing a comprehensive enterprise cloud platform service. Serving over 650 companies across 2,500 locations primarily in Scandinavia, Intility offers a broad range of services including managed cloud, AI platform, digital workplace solutions, security and compliance, and consulting. The company positions itself as a catalyst for digital transformation with a strong emphasis on industrialized IT operations and platform development. Their market presence is supported by a consistent brand, active content updates, and a robust partner ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Hotjar and Fathom Analytics. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. SEO practices are well implemented, enhancing discoverability and user experience. From a security perspective, Intility maintains a strong posture with HTTPS enforced, ISO 27001 certification, and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, there is room for improvement in DNSSEC adoption and explicit security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, Intility presents a low-risk profile with a mature digital presence, strong business credibility, and a professional security approach. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving security header implementation to further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intility.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intility operates in the technology sector with a focus on enterprise cloud solutions and IT platform services. Their business model revolves around providing a managed platform service that integrates cloud, security, AI, and workplace solutions. The company targets medium to large enterprises primarily in Scandinavia but also globally. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offering, ISO 27001 certification, and a strong partner ecosystem including major technology vendors. Revenue streams likely include subscription-based platform services, consulting, and managed cloud offerings. Growth indicators include a large and growing customer base, active content marketing, and event hosting. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, reinforcing trust and market position.

Security posture

Intility demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to recognized standards such as ISO 27001. The website enforces HTTPS and maintains domain transfer protections. Security best practices are evident, though some security headers are not explicitly detected and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing potential areas for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure contacts are publicly available, which could be improved to increase transparency and readiness. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of secure forms indicate good operational security. Overall, the security maturity supports business continuity and compliance but would benefit from formalized public incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website for transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Intility AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intility
Description
Intility is a complete platform service used by more than 650 companies across 2 500 locations in Scandinavia and the rest of the world.
Key services
Complete Platform Service, Managed Cloud, AI Platform, Digital Workplace, Intility SIM, Security and Compliance, Consulting Services, Operational Technology, Property Infrastructure, Intility GPT
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.30.3, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5, Swiper.js, Hotjar, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ISO 27001 certification
  • Security and compliance page detailing practices
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for optimization. It incorporates widely used libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome, and integrates analytics tools like Hotjar and Fathom Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is well maintained with recent versions of core components. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is reputable. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intility.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intility.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.