Skip to main content

Security report for interwetten.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website interwetten.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) block, which prevents access to the actual site content. The domain is well-established, created in 1997, and registered with a reputable registrar, EuroDNS S.A. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers or privacy policies on the accessible page limits the ability to fully assess the site's security and compliance posture. The visible page is a minimal security block message with no business or contact information, indicating that the site is protected by Cloudflare's security mechanisms but currently not accessible to the analyzed client IP. From a technical perspective, the site uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely for DDoS protection and CDN services. The minimal HTML content is mobile responsive but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. No analytics, tracking, or advertising scripts were detected on the blocked page. Security posture is weakly observable due to the block, but the domain registration data is consistent with a legitimate business. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, and no contact or incident response information is provided on the blocked page. The overall risk assessment is limited by the WAF block, but the domain's age and registrar support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interwetten.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Interwetten.com appears to be an established business domain dating back to 1997, likely operating in the online gambling or betting sector given the domain name, although no direct content confirms this due to the WAF block. The business model likely involves online betting or gaming services targeting a European audience, as indicated by the client IP location (Germany) and domain age. The company likely operates in the 'Other' sector category due to lack of explicit sector data. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The domain's longevity suggests a stable market presence, but no direct business intelligence such as revenue streams, partnerships, or customer segments can be confirmed from the blocked content.

Security posture

The current security posture is difficult to fully evaluate due to the Cloudflare WAF block restricting access to the site content. The domain uses Cloudflare nameservers, indicating use of a reputable CDN and security provider. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive security indicator preventing unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided HTML. No privacy or cookie policies or incident response contacts are visible, indicating gaps in compliance and transparency. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare usage) but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including incident response and abuse contacts to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update security configurations and ensure accessibility of the website content beyond WAF blocks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge/block page indicating the request was blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF, preventing access to actual site content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the blocked page.
  3. No contact information or business details visible on the page.
  4. No scripts or external resources other than Cloudflare nameservers and minimal inline CSS.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. The domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. The page is mobile responsive to some extent but content is minimal.
  9. No evidence of adult or explicit content; content safety rating is safe.
  10. Due to WAF blocking, most detailed analysis is not possible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS, CDN, and WAF services. The HTML content is minimal and primarily a security block message with inline CSS styling. No external JavaScript libraries, analytics, or tracking scripts were detected. The site appears to be mobile responsive at a basic level. No CMS or frameworks are identifiable from the blocked page. Performance and SEO optimization cannot be fully assessed due to lack of content. The domain is registered with EuroDNS S.A. and has a long history dating back to 1997, indicating a mature infrastructure. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical modernization opportunities. The current technical state is stable but limited in observable features due to the WAF block.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interwetten.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interwetten.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.