Intertrust Technologies · Technology · N/a
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
Intertrust Technologies is a technology enterprise specializing in trusted digital collaboration and interoperability solutions primarily for the energy and media sectors. The company positions itself as a leader in enabling secure, scalable, and open connectivity across decentralized and data-driven ecosystems. Their key offerings include Intertrust Energy, Intertrust Connect, Flexworks, and PKI solutions, targeting organizations seeking to optimize IoT networks and media distribution with enhanced trust and security. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional branding and comprehensive content tailored to enterprise clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations such as lazy loading, use of GSAP, Typed.js, and integration with HubSpot for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and employs tracking technologies including Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager. However, explicit security headers and detailed security policies are not evident, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, relying instead on contact forms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but the absence of WHOIS data and lack of visible privacy policy or incident response information present gaps in transparency and compliance. The domain WHOIS query returned no match, which is unusual for an established enterprise and may indicate privacy protection or data source issues. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in appearance but would benefit from enhanced transparency and explicit security and privacy disclosures. Strategically, Intertrust should prioritize publishing clear privacy and security policies, provide direct contact channels for incident response, and address the WHOIS data gap to improve domain trustworthiness. These steps will strengthen their security posture and compliance standing, reinforcing their market position as a trusted technology provider.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention intertrust.com, from OffSeq Breach.
2 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for intertrust.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with intertrust.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intertrust.com.