Skip to main content

Security report for interreghusk.eu

Interreg Slovakia-Hungary · Government · Hungary

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Interreg Hungary-Slovakia Programme website serves as an official platform for a European Union funded cross-border regional development initiative between Hungary and Slovakia. The site targets government entities, regional development stakeholders, and EU program participants, providing information about the program and its activities. The business model is government-driven, focusing on regional cooperation and development projects. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting multiple languages to cater to its diverse audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing common libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and Select2, with integration of Google Maps API for geographic information. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are well implemented, including meta tags and structured data, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website employs HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service policies. Contact information is not explicitly provided, which may limit user trust and compliance. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a solid foundation but would benefit from enhanced privacy documentation, security policies, and clearer contact channels to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interreghusk.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Interreg HUSK Programme occupies a niche position as a government-backed cross-border cooperation initiative funded by the EU, focusing on regional development between Hungary and Slovakia. Its competitive advantage lies in EU funding and official government support, targeting regional authorities and stakeholders involved in cross-border projects. The business model is non-commercial, emphasizing information dissemination and program coordination. Growth indicators include multilingual support and structured data usage, signaling digital maturity. The partnership ecosystem appears limited to government and EU entities, with no commercial subsidiaries or related domains identified. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency and user engagement through improved contact and policy disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. There is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response plan, which could hinder effective handling of security incidents. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR documentation, as no privacy policy or data protection officer contact is found. The site uses common third-party libraries, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational government sites but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies clearly accessible on the website.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Provide explicit contact details including emails and phone numbers for user support and compliance purposes.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Interreg Slovakia-Hungary
Description
The Interreg HUSK Programme is a cross-border initiative for regional development between Hungary and Slovakia, funded by the European Union.
Key services
Cross-border regional development initiatives, Information dissemination about EU funded projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, FontAwesome, Select2, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related EU funded cross-border program site.
  2. Content is professional and well structured with multilingual support.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  7. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, leveraging popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and UI enhancement tools like Select2 and FontAwesome icons. It integrates Google Maps API for location services. The site uses Rank Math PRO for SEO optimization, indicating attention to search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with DNS prefetching for key external resources to improve load times. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive meta tags and CSS. Accessibility features are basic, with scope for improvement. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress and standard libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for government informational sites, with opportunities to enhance accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interreghusk.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interreghusk.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.