Skip to main content

Security report for interregeurope.eu

Interreg Europe · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Interreg Europe is a European regional cooperation program that facilitates the sharing of innovative and sustainable solutions among regional and local governments to address regional development challenges. The website serves as a comprehensive platform offering access to approved projects, policy learning resources, events, and a community network. The technical infrastructure is built on Drupal 9 with modern web technologies, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA v3, and adherence to GDPR, reflecting a strong security posture. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, making it a reliable resource for its target audience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of interregeurope.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interregeurope.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The program targets regional and local governments, policymakers, and practitioners across Europe, positioning itself as a key facilitator of policy learning and regional development. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on governmental and non-profit sectors with a large-scale European presence involving 36 countries. The platform's extensive content, active social media presence, and detailed documentation indicate a mature and well-established operation. Strategic partnerships with European institutions and regional bodies enhance its credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website employs strong security practices including mandatory HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The presence of security headers and absence of vulnerable libraries further strengthen its security stance. However, explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not found, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is robust and appropriate for a governmental/non-profit platform.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a dedicated security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  2. Add explicit security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  3. Enhance security headers with HSTS and X-Frame-Options if not already configured at server level.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for updates and vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear contact channels for security-related inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Interreg Europe
Description
Interreg Europe brings regional and local governments together to share innovative and sustainable solutions to regional development challenges.
Key services
Approved projects database, Policy Learning Platform, Events and training, Community networking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 9, jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, LazySizes, Piwik PRO, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Piwik PRO, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive platform for Interreg Europe, a European regional cooperation program.
  2. Content is rich with detailed information about projects, policy learning, events, and community.
  3. Strong emphasis on GDPR compliance and user privacy.
  4. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 9 CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, and LazySizes for performance and user experience enhancements. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for bot protection. Analytics are handled via Piwik PRO, indicating a focus on privacy-compliant data collection. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich content and multiple external resources. No critical technical issues or outdated components were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100 +1Low26 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interregeurope.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interregeurope.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.