Skip to main content

Security report for interreg-baltic.eu

Interreg Baltic Sea Region · Government · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Interreg Baltic Sea Region is an EU-funded regional cooperation platform aimed at fostering innovative projects and collaboration across the Baltic Sea region. The website serves as an informational and facilitation portal for organizations seeking EU funding and partnership opportunities. The platform is positioned as a reputable government/non-profit entity with a clear focus on regional development and cooperation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from stronger privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interreg-baltic.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets organizations and stakeholders involved in regional development within the Baltic Sea area, providing EU funding and cooperation opportunities. Its business model revolves around public funding facilitation and project support under the EU Interreg framework. The platform enjoys a solid market position as an official EU regional program, with trust signals derived from its domain, structured data, and content relevance. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and user engagement. The technical ecosystem is standard for government-related sites, leveraging WordPress and popular plugins. No advertising or tracking mechanisms were detected, aligning with its non-commercial nature.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency in security governance. Forms detected (Gravity Forms) are standard but no detailed analysis of input sanitization or protection was possible. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and security reporting.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet recognized standards and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Interreg Baltic Sea Region
Description
Interreg Baltic Sea Region is a source of EU funding for those with smart ideas to shape the region. We cooperate to let great ideas thrive.
Key services
EU funding facilitation, Regional cooperation, Project support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional EU regional cooperation platform.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML.
  4. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML snippet.
  7. Content is relevant and safe for general audiences.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found.
  9. WHOIS data shows registrar as InterNetX GmbH with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a widely used and flexible CMS platform. It uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Gravity Forms for form management. The site loads fonts from its own domain and uses AJAX for dynamic content loading. Performance is moderate with no evident critical issues but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented. However, the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which aligns with privacy-conscious design but limits marketing insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interreg-baltic.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interreg-baltic.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.