Skip to main content

Security report for internex.de

interneX GmbH · Other · Germany

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

interneX GmbH is a small German company with a basic online presence primarily providing legal and contact information on its website. The company’s market position and detailed business services are not explicitly described, indicating a limited digital footprint. The website is minimalistic, with no advanced content or interactive features, targeting a general audience likely within Germany. Technically, the site is hosted on kasserver.com using Apache with HTTP/2 support and basic CSS styling. Performance is fast, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Security posture shows support for modern TLS protocols without known vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers such as HSTS and OCSP stapling. DNSSEC and DMARC are not implemented, which could expose the domain to DNS and email spoofing risks. Overall, the security score is moderate with room for improvement in compliance and best practices. The website does not include privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, which may impact GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, but no email addresses or social media links are present. Strategic recommendations include enhancing HTTPS security, implementing DNS and email protections, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving privacy compliance to build trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching internex.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
10
GDPR outside view
18
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in an unspecified sector categorized as 'Other' with a small size profile. The presence of a German VAT number and registration indicates formal business operations. The lack of detailed service descriptions or marketing content suggests a limited online commercial activity or a focus on offline business. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified beyond the hosting provider relationship. The business model and revenue streams are not discernible from the website. The company appears to maintain a moderate branding consistency with basic trust indicators such as legal disclosures. Growth indicators and competitive positioning cannot be assessed due to limited data. The website’s minimalism may reflect a niche or specialized business approach or a low priority on digital marketing.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic with support for modern TLS protocols and no detected SSL vulnerabilities. However, the absence of HSTS, OCSP stapling, DNSSEC, and DMARC records indicates gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of cookie consent and privacy policy details raises compliance concerns under GDPR. The domain’s SPF record is valid but uses a neutral qualifier, which weakens email spoofing protection. Overall, the security culture appears minimal, with opportunities to enhance protections and demonstrate commitment to data security and privacy.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS connections.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Deploy DNSSEC to protect DNS queries from tampering and spoofing.
  4. Publish a DMARC record with a stricter policy to enhance email authentication and reduce phishing risks.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
interneX GmbH
VAT number
DE 191606884
Registration number
HR B 190737
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Apache server with HTTP/2 support, indicating a modern web server configuration. The DNS is managed by kasserver.com without DNSSEC enabled, which is a technical risk. SSL certificates cover the hosting provider domain but not the company domain explicitly, which may affect certificate transparency compliance. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, suggesting a static or simple site architecture. Performance metrics indicate fast load times but no detailed resource data is available. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features beyond basic HTML and CSS. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Technical debt appears low due to simplicity but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with internex.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review internex.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.