Skip to main content

Security report for interimia.se

Loopia AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website interimia.se is currently a parked domain hosted by Loopia AB, a major domain registrar and hosting provider in Scandinavia. The page serves primarily as a placeholder informing visitors that the domain is purchased and parked, while promoting Loopia's domain registration, DNS management, and web hosting services. The content is minimal and focused on encouraging domain owners to activate their plans or register new domains through Loopia. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting provider is Loopia, and the site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of a CMS or complex frameworks. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is available. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking, but privacy compliance is poor. The domain is privacy protected in WHOIS, which is typical for parked domains and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the site is a basic parked domain page with minimal content and limited security or privacy features. It is not intended for active business operations. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, providing contact and security incident response information, and improving content quality and user experience to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching interimia.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Loopia AB operates as a domain registrar and web hosting provider primarily serving the Scandinavian market. Their business model centers on domain registration, DNS management, and web hosting services including WordPress and WooCommerce hosting. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking to establish an online presence. Market positioning is strong within Scandinavia as one of the largest domain providers. Revenue streams likely include domain sales, hosting subscriptions, and value-added services. The parked domain page reflects a common practice to monetize unused domains and promote core services. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The business shows moderate digital maturity but the parked domain itself offers limited insight into operational scale or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture of the interimia.se domain as presented is minimal due to its status as a parked domain. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data, which reduces the security score. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, limiting readiness for security events. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking but without clear privacy controls. The domain's WHOIS privacy protection is justified given the domain parking context. Overall, the security maturity is low but acceptable for a non-operational parked domain. Improvements should focus on HTTPS implementation, security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Enhance security posture by adding security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve content quality and user experience to build trust and support business objectives.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Loopia AB
Description
Domain parking service provided by Loopia, a domain registrar and hosting provider in Scandinavia. The page informs visitors that the domain interimia.se is purchased and parked by a Loopia customer and promotes Loopia's domain registration, DNS management, and web hosting services.
Key services
Domain registration, Domain parking, DNS management (LoopiaDNS), Web hosting packages including WordPress, WooCommerce, and Sitebuilder
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No HTTPS or security headers information available from provided data.
  7. Content is basic and intended for domain parking and promotion of Loopia services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, leveraging Google Tag Manager for analytics. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is provided by Loopia, a known domain registrar and hosting provider. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is expected to be moderate given the simple content and external resource loading. Technical debt is low due to minimal complexity but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and compliance. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk that should be addressed to protect users and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with interimia.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review interimia.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.