Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention inter-fair.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for inter-fair.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Mulpor Company S.R.L. · Other · Costa Rica
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.
The International Fairs Directory, operated by Mulpor Company S.R.L., is a well-established online platform providing a comprehensive global overview of fairs and exhibitions. It serves as a key resource for fair exhibitors, visitors, and industry professionals seeking business connections worldwide. The platform offers detailed listings of fairs, exhibitors, and related business contacts, positioning itself as a leading directory in the international trade show and events sector. The business is headquartered in Costa Rica and has been operational since at least 2016, with the domain registered in 2021. Technically, the website employs a custom-built solution leveraging Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, with integrations for Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is hosted by HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a reputable hosting provider. The website demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance, with a professional design and clear navigation structure. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, enhancing privacy compliance, though the privacy policy is basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance details. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and displays a Norton Secured seal, indicating a trustworthy encryption standard. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and several security headers are missing, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web threats. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's business claims, showing no privacy protection and a domain age appropriate for the business history. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation but could benefit from enhanced security practices and more comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen trust and compliance, supporting the platform's role as a global business connector.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention inter-fair.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for inter-fair.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with inter-fair.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inter-fair.com.