Intelligent Systems SIA · Technology · Latvia
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.
Intelligent Systems SIA is a Latvia-based technology company specializing in full-cycle telemetry solutions development. Their website showcases multiple telemetry and fleet management products, including fleet management, fuel control, tachograph data hubs, industrial asset monitoring, wireless tracking, marine monitoring, and employee task planning. The company targets businesses requiring telemetry and asset management solutions and offers white-label partnerships to expand market reach. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and various tracking scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is hosted on Webflow with CDN support from Amazon Cloudfront, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some improvements in accessibility could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with consent checkboxes. However, it lacks important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for enhanced security and GDPR compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, which limits domain registration trust verification. The site does not publish explicit security policies or incident response contacts, nor does it provide vulnerability disclosure information. Overall, Intelligent Systems SIA presents a credible and professional online presence with solid technical infrastructure and moderate security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency around security policies would enhance trust and compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the business credibility based on website content.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention intelligentsystems.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
6 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for intelligentsystems.lv.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with intelligentsystems.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intelligentsystems.lv.