Skip to main content

Security report for integrity.co.uk

Integrity UK Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Integrity UK Ltd is a UK-based brand enhancement consultancy specializing in brand development, employee engagement, and customer experience. The company serves businesses seeking to align their brand vision across all touchpoints, with a portfolio including notable clients such as Volkswagen UK and AXA XL. The website is professionally designed using Joomla CMS and incorporates modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking. While the site is well-structured and mobile-optimized, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and secure form handling, but absence of security headers and incident response information are areas for improvement. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and trustworthy, though WHOIS data for the exact domain queried is unavailable due to domain naming rules, which is typical for subdomains.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching integrity.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an important player in the brand consultancy sector, targeting businesses requiring comprehensive brand strategy and implementation services. Its business model revolves around service delivery with a focus on maintaining brand integrity and engagement. The presence of a diverse team and a strong client portfolio indicates a stable market position. Marketing efforts include active social media engagement and newsletter campaigns via Mailchimp. The company operates primarily in the UK and appears to be a small-sized enterprise. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and design reinforce the company's professional image and market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure form submissions. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates gaps in security governance and transparency. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, although some GDPR-related consent language is present in the newsletter signup. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better policy disclosures and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security policy page including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security governance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Integrity UK Ltd
Description
Integrity is a brand enhancement company that brings brand vision to life across employee and customer touchpoints. They provide brand insight, strategic thinking, and manage marketing and communications programmes to maintain brand alignment and engagement.
Key services
Brand Development, Employee Engagement, Customer Experience
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity carousel, Google Analytics, Mailchimp
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form submission

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Website uses Joomla CMS with common JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Website content is professional and business-focused with no adult or questionable content.
  8. WHOIS data for the exact domain queried is unavailable due to domain naming rules; this is expected for subdomains.
  9. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and Instagram.
  10. Mailchimp is used for newsletter subscription with GDPR consent text present but no explicit checkbox.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity carousel, and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and features a clean, professional design with clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. The use of Mailchimp for email marketing is integrated with a GDPR consent statement, though lacking explicit consent controls. No hosting provider information was identified. The site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features but maintains a solid technical foundation suitable for its business purpose.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with integrity.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review integrity.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.