Skip to main content

Security report for integrationsbolaget.se

Integrationsbolaget · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Integrationsbolaget is a Swedish consulting company specializing in integration and cybersecurity digitalization services. Since its acquisition by Omegapoint in June 2021, it is transitioning its brand to unify under the Omegapoint name. The website serves primarily as an informational landing page announcing this rebranding and linking to the parent company's site for more details. The technical infrastructure is minimal, built with modern but basic web technologies including the Astro framework. The site lacks advanced features such as forms, analytics, or security policies, indicating a low digital maturity level. Security posture is weak due to absence of visible HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for significant improvements in security, privacy, and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching integrationsbolaget.se

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology consulting sector with a focus on integration and cybersecurity services. Its business model revolves around consulting and premium expertise delivery. The acquisition by Omegapoint suggests strategic consolidation to enhance market position and service offerings. The target audience includes existing and prospective customers, suppliers, and recruits interested in cybersecurity and integration solutions. The website content is limited, reflecting a transitional phase in branding rather than a full commercial platform. No direct revenue streams or detailed service descriptions are present on the site. The partnership ecosystem is centered on Omegapoint, with no other partners or subsidiaries mentioned.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The absence of contact information or incident response channels limits the ability to report security issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices is a concern. The security posture requires immediate improvements to align with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish terms of service and security policies to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce contact information including security incident response channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Integrationsbolaget
Description
Integrationsbolaget and Molnbolaget were acquired by the consulting company Omegapoint in June 2021. The company is transitioning its brand to Omegapoint to unify communication and branding. Their offering has expanded to include expertise in cybersecurity digitalization, strengthening delivery capacity and complementing services.
Key services
Integration consulting, Cybersecurity digitalization
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple landing page announcing rebranding to Omegapoint.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  4. Minimal technical complexity; uses Astro framework and basic HTML/CSS/JS.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  6. External link to omegapoint.se is present, indicating parent company relationship.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No social media or email contacts found in the content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Astro framework with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. The page is lightweight with a single video background and minimal interactive elements. Performance is likely moderate given the video content but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tag present but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta description, Open Graph tags, or structured data. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The technical setup is simple and modern but lacks depth and robustness for a corporate presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with integrationsbolaget.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review integrationsbolaget.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.