Skip to main content

Security report for integration.lv

Integration and Inclusion Agency of Latvia · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Integration and Inclusion Agency of Latvia operates as a government/non-profit entity focused on providing comprehensive support and consultations to newcomers, third-country nationals, refugees, and asylum seekers in Latvia. The agency offers a range of services including legal advice, interpreting and translation, psychological support, and personalized assistance through Change Agent services. The website positions itself as an official resource supported by European funds, targeting individuals seeking integration assistance in Latvia. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor and Slider Revolution, ensuring a visually appealing and responsive design. The site incorporates multilingual support via WPML and employs Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification, but the website's branding and content strongly indicate legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with strong content quality and privacy compliance, suitable for its government/non-profit role. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and domain registration verification would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching integration.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency holds a key position in Latvia's integration ecosystem, supported by European funds and targeting a niche audience of newcomers and asylum seekers. Its business model revolves around providing free or government-funded services including consultations, legal advice, and psychological support. The presence of multiple physical offices across Latvian cities indicates a medium-sized operation with regional outreach. The website's multilingual capabilities and comprehensive service offerings suggest a well-established entity with a clear mission. Partnerships with Ukrainian support organizations and the Society Integration Fund highlight a collaborative approach. The agency's market presence is stable, focusing on social integration rather than commercial revenue streams.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Use of Google reCAPTCHA adds protection against automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No published security or incident response policies reduce transparency. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were observed in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure channel limits external security engagement. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional headers, publishing policies, and enabling vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is accessible and consistent with the organization's identity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Integration and Inclusion Agency of Latvia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Integration and Inclusion Agency of Latvia
Description
Opportunities and life in Latvia. It starts here! We provide consultations and support to Newcomers, Third-Country Nationals and Asylum Seekers in Latvia
Key services
Consultations and informative support, Change Agent services, Interpreting and translation, Legal advice, Psychologist and psychotherapist services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR plugin, WPML Multilingual CMS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support.
  2. Strong focus on providing integration and support services for third-country nationals and asylum seekers in Latvia.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies for UI and UX.
  5. Contact information is clear and includes multiple channels.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor for page building and Slider Revolution for dynamic content presentation. It uses jQuery and Google services for analytics and security. The site is multilingual, supporting English, Latvian, and Russian, enhancing accessibility for its target audience. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization plugins likely in use (e.g., Autoptimize). Accessibility features such as font scaling and contrast options are implemented, reflecting good UX practices. The technical stack is well-suited for the agency's needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with integration.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review integration.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.