Skip to main content

Security report for intaker.com

Intaker Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Intaker Inc. is a specialized technology company providing marketing automation tools tailored for law firms. Their platform offers services such as website chat, two-way texting, client intake, lead management, and workflow automation designed to enhance client engagement and streamline law firm operations. The company positions itself as a niche SaaS provider with a focus on legal industry marketing technology, supported by customer testimonials and integrations with well-known platforms like Zapier and Salesforce. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure, and utilizes Google Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, clear navigation, and professional design quality. However, some accessibility features are basic, and performance is moderate. The domain is well-established, registered since 2000, indicating a mature business presence. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers were detected. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit privacy compliance features suggests partial GDPR compliance. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, Intaker presents a credible and professional online presence with a solid business model and technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security practices and privacy compliance would strengthen their posture and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching intaker.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Intaker operates in the legal technology sector, targeting law firms seeking to improve client acquisition and management through automation. Their SaaS business model leverages integrations with popular CRM and marketing tools, enhancing their competitive advantage. The company’s long domain history and consistent branding support market credibility. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for access to their suite of marketing and client intake products. The presence of testimonials and integration partners indicates a growing ecosystem and customer base. Strategic partnerships with platforms like Zapier and Salesforce expand their market reach and operational capabilities.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective status flags. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces resilience against certain attacks. The absence of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the public content. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response policies would significantly improve the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Intaker Inc.
Description
Law Firm marketing technology to make lawyers stand out. Convert your law firm’s website traffic into happy clients with Intaker's state-of-the-art automation tools.
Key services
Website chat, Two-way texting, Follow-up automation, Client intake, Lead management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Analytics, Azure DNS, JavaScript, Google Fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Azure
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Zapier
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on legal marketing technology with clear service offerings.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and integrations with popular platforms.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term domain ownership.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Webflow CMS and is hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure, indicating a modern and scalable technical foundation. Use of Google Fonts, jQuery, and Google Analytics reflects standard web development practices. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The site integrates with multiple third-party services such as Zapier, Salesforce, and Calendly, which supports extensibility but requires careful security management. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with intaker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review intaker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.