INSPIRE · Technology · United Kingdom
High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
INSPIRE is a UK-based small technology company specializing in website design, development, and managed hosting services primarily using WordPress. The company positions itself as a niche provider offering responsive, performance-optimized websites with additional services such as GA4 integration and ecommerce startup support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeting businesses seeking digital presence solutions. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and GDPR compliance plugins, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the domain registration aligns well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is partially addressed via cookie consent but lacks a dedicated privacy policy page. The site uses analytics and tracking pixels responsibly with user consent. The overall risk is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing privacy and security documentation and headers.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk
What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing
What to do: Consider restricting access to NetBIOS or implementing strong authentication
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention inspiredm.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for inspiredm.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with inspiredm.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inspiredm.co.uk.