Skip to main content

Security report for inside-flo.fr

Inside Groupement Flo · Other · France

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Inside Groupement Flo operates a secure login portal likely intended for members or employees, providing controlled access to internal services. The website is minimalistic, focusing on authentication without public-facing content or detailed business descriptions. The technical infrastructure uses the Foundation CSS framework and jQuery library, hosted via OVH, a reputable provider. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. Security posture shows some positive practices such as CSRF token implementation in the login form; however, the absence of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the site is moderately secure but lacks transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inside-flo.fr

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
15
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small entity founded in 2011, operating in France, with a focus on providing access-controlled services to a defined user base. The lack of public business information limits detailed market positioning analysis. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting business credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The business model centers on secure user authentication, likely supporting internal workflows or member services. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the login page.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate with basic protections such as CSRF tokens in place. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found, but the lack of incident response contact channels and security policies is a compliance gap. GDPR compliance cannot be confirmed due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from domain and standard practice) but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, security practices are foundational but require enhancements to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add visible contact information including security incident reporting channels.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Inside Groupement Flo
Description
The website appears to be a login portal for Inside Groupement Flo, likely serving members or employees. No explicit business description is provided on the login page.
Key services
User authentication and access to internal services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token in login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal with minimal public content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact information or social media links present.
  4. Uses Foundation CSS framework and jQuery library.
  5. CSRF token implemented in login form indicating some security awareness.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security features detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No advertising or marketing tools present.
  9. Domain is well-registered and consistent with business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CSS framework (Foundation) and jQuery for client-side scripting, indicating a moderately modern tech stack. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable European provider. The site is basic in design with minimal content, which supports moderate performance. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond charset and viewport. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No CMS or advanced platforms detected. No analytics or marketing tools are integrated, reducing tracking and privacy concerns but also limiting marketing insights. Technical debt appears low given the simplicity but modernization opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inside-flo.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inside-flo.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.