Skip to main content

Security report for inpress.cz

INPRESS a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INPRESS a.s. is a well-established family-owned printing company based in České Budějovice, Czech Republic, with nearly two decades of experience. The company specializes in a broad range of printing services including books, calendars, flyers, posters, and paper bags, serving both domestic and international clients. Their market position is that of a medium-sized manufacturer with a strong regional presence and a reputation for quality and customer service. Technically, the website employs modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, and is hosted likely via Wedos, a known Czech hosting provider. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy page but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching inpress.cz

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INPRESS operates in the manufacturing sector focused on printing services. Their business model revolves around providing comprehensive printing solutions to businesses and agencies primarily in the Czech Republic and neighboring European countries. The company leverages its nearly 20 years of experience and medium size to balance production capacity with personalized customer service. Their partnership ecosystem includes membership in the Czech-German Chamber of Commerce, enhancing their credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include recent investments in production information systems and active content updates. The company maintains a multi-language website to cater to diverse clients. Revenue streams are likely from printing orders across various product categories. Strategic observations suggest a stable family business with potential for digital transformation and enhanced security compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and forms include CSRF tokens, indicating attention to secure data handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent banner. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly documented. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with stronger privacy controls. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
INPRESS a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INPRESS a.s.
Description
Inpress je rodinná tiskárna v Českých Budějovicích. Specializujeme se na tisk všeho druhu od knih až po plakáty. Přidejte se k našim spokojeným zákazníkům.
Key services
Book printing, Calendar printing, Flyer printing, Poster printing, Paper bags printing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multi-language support.
  3. Contact details and social media links are clearly provided.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie banners visible, but privacy policy page exists.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  6. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. Business is a medium-sized family printing company with strong local and regional presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. It employs Swiper.js for UI components and is likely hosted by Wedos, a reputable Czech hosting provider. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The HTML is valid and structured, though no CMS is explicitly identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic usability standards. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with inpress.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review inpress.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.