Skip to main content

Security report for innsandleisure.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.innsandleisure.co.uk is currently inaccessible to visitors due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page implemented by BitNinja. This CAPTCHA challenge blocks access to the actual website content, preventing a full assessment of the business or services offered. The domain WHOIS lookup failed with an error indicating the domain name contains too many parts and cannot be registered, suggesting the domain is either invalid or improperly configured. The site uses legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, likely remnants or placeholders rather than active platforms. External scripts include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor is any contact or business information available. Overall, the site appears to be a security gate rather than a functional business website at this time.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innsandleisure.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF blocking and lack of accessible content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain registration failure further undermines credibility. The presence of BitNinja's security challenge indicates a focus on protecting the site from automated threats, but no information about market positioning, business model, or services is available. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The site does not provide contact details or legal disclosures, limiting trust and transparency.

Security posture

The security posture is mixed. On one hand, the site employs BitNinja's WAF with CAPTCHA to mitigate automated attacks, which is a positive security control. On the other hand, the domain registration issues and lack of visible security headers or SSL configuration details raise concerns. The use of outdated CMS references suggests potential technical debt or neglect. No privacy or data protection policies are found, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the security controls are present but the site is currently inaccessible, limiting user trust and usability.

Recommendations

  1. Remove or properly configure the WAF CAPTCHA to allow legitimate user access while maintaining security.
  2. Resolve domain registration issues to ensure the domain is valid and properly registered.
  3. Update CMS platforms to supported, secure versions or remove legacy meta tags to avoid confusion.
  4. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website is currently blocked by a BitNinja WAF CAPTCHA challenge page requiring user validation before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v2

Security

Observed score
20/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to a WAF CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja.
  2. No WHOIS data available; domain registration failed per Nominet.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details present.
  5. Website appears to be a security gate rather than a business site.
  6. Use of outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) suggests legacy or placeholder content.
  7. Multiple external tracking and analytics scripts detected.
  8. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  9. No business or legal information found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS meta tags indicating Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and unsupported. External scripts include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The HTML content is a WAF CAPTCHA challenge page served by BitNinja, blocking access to actual site content. No security headers or SSL/TLS configuration details are visible in the provided data. The site includes a language selector with multiple translations, indicating internationalization support. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears to be focused on security gating rather than content delivery at this time.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innsandleisure.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innsandleisure.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.