Skip to main content

Security report for innowacyjnejst.pl

Fundacja na Rzecz Wsparcia Innowacji w JST · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundacja na Rzecz Wsparcia Innowacji w JST is a Polish non-profit organization dedicated to supporting local government units (JST) through innovative solutions, training, consulting, and software tools. The foundation targets municipalities, counties, and regions in Poland, aiming to modernize and improve public administration efficiency. Their key services include public relations support, social consultation platforms, legal and economic consulting, and specialized training programs. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact channels and client references from Polish local governments. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI libraries. It uses HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC are implemented, which presents some security improvement opportunities. From a security perspective, the site has a moderate posture with HTTPS and anti-bot measures but lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, showing a legitimate and stable presence since 2016. Overall, the website is a credible and professional platform for a specialized non-profit serving Polish local governments. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innowacyjnejst.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche market supporting Polish local governments with innovative IT and consulting services. Its competitive advantage lies in combining expertise in public administration with tailored software and training solutions. The business model is non-profit, focusing on service delivery rather than commercial sales. Revenue likely comes from grants, contracts, and partnerships. The target customers are government units at various administrative levels. The partnership ecosystem includes Euro Innwacje and MTD Consulting, indicating collaboration with other innovation and consulting entities. Growth indicators include a stable domain age, active social media presence, and a portfolio of client logos. The foundation's operations emphasize comprehensive support across legal, economic, IT, and PR domains, positioning it as a trusted advisor in the public sector innovation space.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protects the contact form against spam and abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response information is published, limiting transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated vulnerable libraries. Compliance with GDPR is partial, as no privacy policy is found, and cookie consent mechanisms are minimal. The security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundacja na Rzecz Wsparcia Innowacji w JST
Description
Fundacja wspiera polski samorząd terytorialny (JST) poprzez innowacyjne rozwiązania, szkolenia, konsultacje społeczne, wsparcie PR, konsulting oraz programy komputerowe. Celem jest unowocześnianie JST, oszczędność czasu i pieniędzy oraz kompleksowa pomoc w dziedzinach informatycznych, prawnych, ekonomicznych i PR.
Key services
Wsparcie PR, Programy komputerowe do konsultacji społecznych i diagnozy kompetencji, Szkolenia dla JST, Konsulting prawny, ekonomiczny i biznesowy, Konsultacje społeczne online, Program Lider Innowacji "LION"
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Fancybox, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, WordPress 6.6.2, Contact Form 7, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, bxSlider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site targeting Polish local government units.
  2. Content is in Polish language and focused on innovation support for JST.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and contact form.
  4. No privacy policy page found, but cookie policy link is present without explicit consent mechanism.
  5. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided.
  7. Use of multiple external trusted libraries and services including Google Analytics and Facebook SDK.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform version 6.6.2, leveraging common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Fancybox, Owl Carousel, and bxSlider for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and social media engagement. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Hosting appears to be with home.pl S.A., a reputable Polish provider. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA labels and screen-reader considerations on forms. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt is low but could be improved by upgrading Bootstrap to a newer version and enhancing security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for the foundation's needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innowacyjnejst.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innowacyjnejst.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.