Skip to main content

Security report for innotech-safety.com

INNOTECH Deutschland · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

INNOTECH Deutschland is a leading European manufacturer specializing in reliable fall protection systems, offering tailored solutions such as rope, rail, and railing safety systems. The company targets industrial clients and safety managers, positioning itself as a trusted B2B provider in the manufacturing sector. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, Hotjar, and Cookiebot, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about registration transparency, but the professional website and consistent branding mitigate some trust issues. Overall, the site is safe, well-structured, and compliant with GDPR, but improvements in contact visibility and domain registration transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching innotech-safety.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention innotech-safety.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for innotech-safety.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INNOTECH Deutschland operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on fall protection safety systems. Its market position is strong in Europe, supported by a clear B2B business model targeting industrial safety needs. The company leverages partnerships, such as the related Austrian domain innotech.at, to expand regional presence. Revenue streams likely include product sales and customized safety solutions. The website's integration with marketing and analytics platforms indicates active customer engagement and lead generation efforts. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and improved transparency in domain registration and contact information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS, multiple security headers, and a granular cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. Use of XSRF-TOKEN cookies indicates protection against cross-site request forgery. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is high but could be improved by adding explicit security documentation and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  3. Add visible and verified company contact information such as emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Implement or publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
INNOTECH Deutschland
Description
Führender Hersteller von Absturzsicherungen in Europa mit maßgeschneiderten Systemen für Seilsicherung, Schienensicherung, Geländersicherung und mehr.
Key services
Absturzsicherungssysteme, Seilsicherung, Schienensicherung, Geländersicherung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, HubSpot, Hotjar, Cloudflare (implied by cookies)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of security headers
  • Prevention of cross-site request forgery (XSRF-TOKEN cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern marketing and analytics tools.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, indicating a stable and scalable platform. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Hotjar, and Cookiebot shows a comprehensive approach to analytics, marketing, and privacy compliance. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading for performance optimization. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. Hosting details are not explicit, but Cloudflare-related cookies suggest use of CDN or security services. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and contact information visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with innotech-safety.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review innotech-safety.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.